User talk:JJNito197/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Red Hair

Hi. I've reverted your edits to Red Hair. I've nothing specific against a lot of what you did, but unfortunately you used as a source a "BritainsDNA" document stored under "guff documents" at the University College London. See discussion here regarding what the genetic scientists there think about this company. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 21:51, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Hello there. Thank you for correcting, have removed false source that you have stated also. My fault for not proof reading, Regards JJNito197 (talk) 10:38, 14 January 2019 (UTC) JJNito197

Hi. Repeatedly removing cited material in an article because you don't care for it, without any discussion, is disruptive and may cause you to be blocked from editing. If you want to discuss your edit, the proper place to do it in on the talk page, not through reverting edit summaries. Please try and reach consensus on things, rather than tit-for-tat edits. Also, please don't take images from other websites, then upload them saying you own them. Wikipedia takes copyright seriously.

If you'd care to undo your last revert, or implement the improvement suggested, we can get discuss things. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 19:30, 8 September 2019 (UTC)

Alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Shrike (talk) 16:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lebanese cuisine

The article Lebanese cuisine you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lebanese cuisine for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Editoneer -- Editoneer (talk) 16:22, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Lebanese cuisine

On 6 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lebanese cuisine, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that many dishes in Lebanese cuisine can be traced back thousands of years to eras of Roman, Greek, Persian, Byzantine, Arab, Egyptian, and Phoenician rule? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lebanese cuisine. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Lebanese cuisine), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 12:02, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Lebanese Cuisine Effort

	GA Award
	For your efforts on Lebanese cuisine, always improving this page, you deserve this medal. Editoneer (talk) 12:47, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Appreciated! Thanks for your helpful input regarding that article. Regards JJNito197 (talk) 17:25, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Seconded. Great work JJ. Onceinawhile (talk) 22:25, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Thank you very much Onceinawhile, I appreciate that. JJNito197 (talk) 17:48, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

WP:PHO

You are invited to join WikiProject Phoenicia

You appear to be someone who may be interested in joining WikiProject Phoenicia. Please accept this friendly invitation from a member of the project.
I can't wait for us to work together! ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 08:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Let's go!

Hello talkallam, thanks for inviting me I would be glad to join and help out! JJNito197 (talk) 16:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

baba ghanoush vs mutabbal

So most every cooking website I end up at after searches says baba ganoush has no tahini but does have onions and tomoatoes while it's mutabbal that is roasted eggplant, olive oil, tahini, garlic and salt (maybe other spices but no other veggies). These websites are all in agreement that Wikipdia (and most English dictionaries) have it wrong:

"Both mutabal and baba ganoush are made using grilled eggplants. In fact, they both contain garlic, lemon and salt too.

The difference comes down to a specific ingredient. In mutabal, tahini, which is a slightly bitter, earthy, nutty paste made from sesame seeds, is added. This adds a very distinct flavor and texture, which really separates one eggplant dip from the other.

Secondly, baba ganoush is often served with onions, tomatoes and other vegetables, while mutabal is normally just served as a dip, although the Lebanese version is sometimes served with pomegranate seeds and walnuts."

The only English dictionary I can find that excludes tahini from the prime (non-optional) ingredient list is Cambridge Dictionary (which is excluded from the article) https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/baba-ghanoush. We need one reliable source on the history of baba ganoush/mutabbal that explains the controversy and word usage so we are not using OR to explain this different ingredient usage and naming across regions.

The article lead currently says baba ganoush has tahini in it which goes against all the top search engine recipes. It also says that mutabbal has onions and tomatoes in it which is also wrong. 35.129.1.59 (talk) 14:18, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I have changed a few things around. I think the problem arose when these two articles were merged as they were previously both independent articles. If you need to add anything futher feel free to contribute JJNito197 (talk) 15:38, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Your edit to Arab Christians has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 13:40, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

Sabian

Thanks for spotting my mistake at Anastas Al-Karmali - that one slipped through the cracks while fixing hundreds of links that were meant for the cymbal company. Do you happen to know what Sabian should actually link to? Could it be the Sabaean language? Lennart97 (talk) 09:10, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Lennart97 Hello and no problem! It would be Sabaean language after looking deeper as Anastas was a philologist. Kind regards JJNito197 (talk)

Fixed, thanks! Lennart97 (talk) 10:08, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict...please fill out my survey?

Hello :) I am writing my MA dissertation on Wikipedia Wars and the Israel-Palestine conflict, and I noticed that you have contributed to those pages. My dissertation will look at the process of collaborative knowledge production on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and the effect it has on bias in the articles. This will involve understanding the profiles and motivations of editors, contention/controversy and dispute resolution in the talk pages, and bias in the final article.

For more information, you can check out my meta-wiki research page or my user page, where I will be posting my findings when I am done.

I would greatly appreciate if you could take 5 minutes to fill out this quick survey before 8 August 2021.

Participation in this survey is entirely voluntary and anonymous. There are no foreseeable risks nor benefits to you associated with this project.

Thanks so much,

Sarah Sanbar

Sarabnas ^{I'm researching Wikipedia} _Questions? 16:00, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arab Christians

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arab Christians you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 11:40, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arab Christians

The article Arab Christians you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Arab Christians for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 12:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arab Christians

The article Arab Christians you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Arab Christians for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 01:01, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Resilient Barnstar

Many congratulations on getting Arab Christians to WP:GA. It was quite an ordeal to get there; very well done for persevering. 1,200 edits over more than a year is a huge effort, in addition to having to work alongside some interesting characters along the way. This is what the article looked like immediately before you started. You should be very proud. Onceinawhile (talk) 23:00, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Onceinawhile Thank you for this, coming from an established editor like yourself is it very precious to me. It was definitely time consuming but I hope it can clear up any misconceptions to the public whilst highlighting the many sub identities; which prior to working on this, I was not fully aware. I'm going to take a breather and research the next topic to improve.. thinking about doing Lebanon next! Best, JJNito197 (talk) 23:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

First warning for continuous vandalism to the Antiochian Greek Christians Page

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiochian_Greek_Christians. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Levantinerum (talk) 10:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Stop the vandalism, last warning

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiochian_Greek_Christians, you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Levantinerum (talk • contribs) 11:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Report for vandalizing the Antiochian Greek Christians page with unjustifiable claims and with no backed up arguments

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antiochian_Greek_Christians, you may be blocked from editing. Turkified Greek (talk) 12:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Advaita Vedanta, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:15, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

This is a disruptive mass-revert of sourced info, and this is an abuse of warning-templates. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 13:18, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--RegentsPark (comment) 16:38, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Bias

Hello, I'm Zlogicalape. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, yet showed possible bias to terminology. Middle-East is the appropriate & fitting term since "Arab World" is exclusive of the rest. (ex: Cyprus, Israel, ... who are not part of the Arab world). Please refrain from using terms that exclude others as this might be considered as bias. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Zlogicalape (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 18:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Auto-archive

I've taken the liberty to put MiszaBot at top of your talkpage; it archives old threads automatically. Tip: don't remove warnings and the like; just let them be archived, but don't give the impression you want to hide something. Experienced editors, and admins, will simply scroll through your history. regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 15:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

@Joshua Jonathan: Thank you for that. I tried configuring some auto-archive bot prior which never worked.. I will answer the above later as I am currently busy at the moment. Thanks again, JJNito197 (talk) 15:33, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Sanskrit and neo-Advaita

Regarding the translation of Sanskrit, at least three English translations of Shankara's Brahma Sutra Bhasya are available. Comparing them is bewildering; it's almost as if three different texts are translated. Two translators even explicitly state that verse four can be translated in two significantly different ways, giving both translations.

Regarding neo-Advaita, that is indeed quite different from classical Advaita. Classical Advaita is exegesis, of texts (Brahma Sutra I.1.3: "Brahman is realisable only trough the scriptures"). Neo-Advaita, in line with Vivekananda's neo-Vedanta, takes a quite different approach, and puts 'experience' at front. But these 'neo's' have deeper roots, in the incorporation of Yoga-thought and practice into Advaita textual exegesis (and vice versa). Nicholson, Unifying Hinduism, has a good treatment on this development. And Rambacharan, The Limits of Scripture, is a good study on Vibekananda's (mis)understanding of Shankara. But then, what is 'real' Advaita Vedanta? The texts from one author from 1200 years ago, writing in response to the philosophies of his time; or present-day Advaita-Yoga, which is a living tradition?

Regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 06:10, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

@Joshua Jonathan: I am familiar with Sankara and I do view him as the foremost exponent of the philosophy; however looking deeper, I understand him firmly to be belonging to Hinduism, or Sanatana Dharma, with no "inherent" influence in the sense of foundational roots. I do not recognize that Buddhism has an influence on Advaita specifically; in the sense of foundational roots, in that Hinduism is the diametric opposite; everything/brahman/vedic/astika vs the nothing/anatta/avaidika/nastika to put it bluntly. I can metaphorically explain this as adding further details (improving the clarity) to a finished, perfect painting. I view them polar opposite in this regard but sharing truth where it is evident (dharma etc). In terms of Sanskrit definitions I do agree that early Buddhist terminology is helpful to understand the not fully explored definitions including expressions of shared phenomena, although I believe it is also confusing. I think the foundational difference when I started studying this philosphy is that I didn't deviate[1] from the roots in my understanding that the Shankaracharya traditon was precedent in order to comprehend it as "purely" as I could. I understand Neo-Advaita to be not so much a discipline but more of a realization based approach akin to the fruits of japa. I do not doubt the foundational truth of it, but I have a concern with the lack of emphasis on effort; in contrast to the methodical, structured approach of tradional or classical advaita of which Sankara and others sprang. In response to what is the 'real' Advaita Vedanta, I would say Hinduism as the tradition gives precedence to the Vedas. I do not see them as separate. Best JJNito197 (talk) 02:25, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Witness-consciousness

Maybe of interest to you:

Awareness Without a Sense of Self, which refers to
Gamma & Metzinger (2021), The Minimal Phenomenal Experience questionnaire (MPE-92M): Towards a phenomenological profile of “pure awareness” experiences in meditators

After all, that's what present-day Advaita (broadly constructed) is about (I think): yogic witness-consciousness cast in an Advaita Vedanta (Upanishadic) framework. PS: see also "tonic alertness." Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 07:42, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

Levantine Arabic FAC

Hi JJNito, I nominated Levantine Article for FAC. As you contributed to articles related to Lebanese culture, I thought you could be interested in reviewing this nomination. Thanks for any help you can provide. A455bcd9 (talk) 08:44, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello JJNito197! Your additions to Arab Christians have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

February 2023

Your recent editing history at Dabke shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Dabke. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:45, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Culture of Europe

Hi. Vandalism as a quite specific menaing here on Wikipedia and the section you removed here most definitly was not vandalism. Off-topic? Sure. But a good faith edit by (apparently) a noob. Please don't WP:BITE the noobs. Kleuske (talk) 11:31, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Sorry you're right. Even if I think is so, wikipedia doesn't. I should always keep that in mind. JJNito197 (talk) 11:34, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

You weren't that far off. He used the same boiler-plate text to spam several articles. I have given him a warning for spamming. Kleuske (talk) 11:40, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

And if you want to be totally vindicated, the guy just got blocked as an LTA. Good call, after all is said and done. Kleuske (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Hindsight is a wonderful thing! Best, JJNito197 (talk) 13:23, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Greetings

Why was my edit on palestinians reverted? Palestinians are descended from arabs that were there millennia ago. Firekong1 (talk) 23:04, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

No not just Arabs, they are also descended from people who have inhabited the region for millenia including Greeks and Syriacs. JJNito197 (talk) 06:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Ah, my mistake. But that should’ve been specified in the beginning of the article though. The way it was phrased makes it seem confusing. Firekong1 (talk) 02:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

If we do specify, the list would be long which is why "people" or "peoples" was used to accomodate them. JJNito197 (talk) 09:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

I mean like using a couple of groups as an example, not an entire list. Firekong1 (talk) 11:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

I think that would probably be redundant and exclusionary (to those excluded). Its best to leave it how it is. Kind regards JJNito197 (talk) 11:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Alright then. Just thought I’d ask. Thanks for letting me know. Firekong1 (talk) 16:23, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

EC request - WP:3O

Hi JJNito97,

I've asked for a WP:3O regarding my edit request. I feel like it has been circumvented with Okedem's comments and my edit request was lost in the back and forth. I hope to discuss further. Thanks. Chavmen (talk) 08:07, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Hi Chavmen, good idea. We need fresh eyes on it. Thank you JJNito197 (talk) 09:46, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Second Intermediate Period of Egypt

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Second Intermediate Period of Egypt you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Merytat3n -- Merytat3n (talk) 00:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Second Intermediate Period of Egypt

The article Second Intermediate Period of Egypt you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Second Intermediate Period of Egypt for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Merytat3n -- Merytat3n (talk) 21:43, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thank you for making Igai (deity)! BuySomeApples (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at [[2]], you may be blocked from editing. — This is the last time I'm going to say this, you know full well not to change the ideology section without consensus, you have been told multiple times in the past, and you persist in doing it as soon as you think people have stopped watching the page. Do it again and it's going directly to ANI for review. You clearly have issues with edit-warring on subjects you have personal connections to; I recommend avoiding these topics if you cannot contribute constructively. 69.157.1.37 (talk) 02:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)