User talk:JJwillard

January 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Basic income has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Basic income was changed by JJwillard (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.910194 on 2018-01-29T12:46:09+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:46, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Basic income. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 13:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Basic income, you may be blocked from editing. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 14:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Basic income. Clubjustin ^Talkosphere 14:11, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality[edit]

Why are people coming out of the woodwork to edit euphemisms if a concept is outlined in a Wikipedia and the principles are cited in a work with socialism in the title let's use socialism in Wikipedia instead of various euphemisms. Otherwise let's stop citing works with words in the title you don't want included in a concept for readers on Wikipedia to learn about. This practice is intentionally deceiving and evil and against what free dissemination of information stands for. We must Endeavour to present unbiased principles or Divergent points of view so it is obvious whatever principal might be discussed is not fact. JJwillard (talk) 15:48, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest you raise these issues at Talk:Basic income instead of here, as it's unlikely that involved editors will see your comments on your own user talk page. Since your edits have already been reverted several times, you should make sure to establish consensus for your changes on the talk page there before trying to add them back to the article. I'd suggest talking about one edit at a time, whichever change is most important to you first, so the discussion can focus around that and establish consensus for that first instead of sprawling out to discuss many different changes all at once. Best of luck. --Pfhorrest (talk) 01:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]