User talk:Jamie M Hayes

Image tagging for Image:Ooser.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ooser.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:23, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Postajankt-iki or Sorni-iki, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

I think this might be something that might benefit from your taking to Wikipedia:Deletion review if the referenced website (http://haldjas.folklore.ee/~anzori/HANT2ENG.HTM) meets criteria noted at Wikipedia:Reliable sources. User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:16, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought ... what is the distinction between the article that was just deleted and Postajankt-iki? If they are closely related, I recommend your expanding Postajankt-iki rather than pursuing undeletion. Titles like X or Y are not good titles; rather redirects tagged with Template:R from alternative name should be used. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 17:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Jamie M Hayes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

I've nominated Roman propaganda for Speedy deletion as it seems to me not to conform to our policy of no original research, WP:OR. You are welcome to contest this. Moreschi ^Deletion! 13:30, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Heini-iki for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Heini-iki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Heini-iki until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MSJapan (talk) 02:45, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]