User talk:Javier2005

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Javier2005, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Diego (talk) 13:33, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please follow a dispute resolution process[edit]

Javier, repeating your edits will no . When there's a disagreement about content, the proper way to act is stop editing and discuss the change at the talk page, follwing the steps at the dispute resolution page one by one. The various editors that have removed your edits all these times are acting against policy, but you should not get dragged to follow their bad example; they could block your access to editing Wikipedia if you don't. Diego (talk) 13:54, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, im still learning and definitely trying my best to be neutral, felt very disappointed by what happened. Javier2005 (talk) 14:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What you really need to do is to bring up the issue at the talk page. I see that you've done that, so thank you! Can I help you with anything? Please either reply at my talk page or leave a quick note there saying that you responded here. Nyttend (talk) 14:20, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Javier2005 (talk) 14:28, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I saw that you removed your own comment from the talk page — FYI, this isn't generally a good thing. In this case, we need to keep that comment there, since people had already replied to it; without your comment, the other people's comments don't make much sense. Nyttend (talk) 14:31, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In most cases, no official decision is needed; a small discussion, like the one in which you've participated here, basically can be understood just by looking at different people's opinions. Here, it looks like most people disagree with your insertions of the material. unless I'm badly misunderstanding something. If you want an official ruling on something, you can make a request at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure, but it tends to be quite backlogged, and anyway it's normally best suited for situations where discussion has died down, not situations like this where the discussion is ongoing. Nyttend (talk) 15:29, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BLP Discretionary sanctions notice[edit]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Dreadstar ☥ 17:51, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This notice relates to Gamergate controversy, Zoe Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, and related articles, talk pages and edits, but note this this alert applies to all edits related to the area identified above. Dreadstar ☥ 17:52, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Anita Sarkeesian. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dreadstar ☥ 22:27, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Javier, your comments in the "Wikileaks" section show a lack of good faith or a lack of reading skills, or both. No one is threatening you with posting your personal information on Wikipedia. Please drop it: it is not helping the atmosphere there. And no more of those "who" tags please. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 04:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not interested on what you have to say, please don't contact me anymore. Javier2005 (talk) 05:07, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Nip Gamergate in the bud. Thank you. —Ryūlóng (琉竜) 19:53, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Ryulong: Can't find discussion... EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 20:26, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it went to WP:ANI instead of WP:AN.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 20:27, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hahahaha nice try Javier2005 (talk) 03:06, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:WikiLeaks[edit]

Your concerns have been addressed on the talk page per your requests. As I also say on the article's talk page, Wikipedia cannot and will not identify the anonymous Reddit members who made the statements that you are demanding to know "who" was the person who said it.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 04:13, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]