User talk:Jeffhoo

Full disclosure, I am a member of the ESD Industry Council, and participated in the writing of the related SEED Whitepapers. I don't believe that this violates the COI because this design methodology is informational only. Jeffhoo (talk) 17:24, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/System Efficient ESD Design (SEED) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/System Efficient ESD Design (SEED), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/System Efficient ESD Design (SEED)[edit]

Hello Jeffhoo. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "System Efficient ESD Design (SEED)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/System Efficient ESD Design (SEED)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:00, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Field Collapse Pulse[edit]

Hello, Jeffhoo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Field Collapse Pulse, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:System Efficient ESD Design[edit]

Hello, Jeffhoo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:System Efficient ESD Design, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:06, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:System Efficient ESD Design[edit]

Hello, Jeffhoo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "System Efficient ESD Design".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:10, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Field Collapse Pulse (April 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Field Collapse Pulse and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 18:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jeffhoo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 18:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]