User talk:Jerem43/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
My help section
{{help}}
Is there any way to make a single company infobox for use in multiple articles? I am working on the Burger King articles and since each one is about a segment of the company (think one article, five parts), and I want to make a single infobox template and make changes there instead of in each individual article.
All help is appreciated.
Jeremy (22:37, 13 November 2007 (UTC))
- Yes, just create a page in the Template: namespace (such as Template:Infobox Burger King or something) and you can copy the code from an existing infobox (say Template:Infobox Company) and modify it as needed to get what you want. I hope this helps, but if you need assistance with the coding, let me know and I'll take a look. Hersfold (t/a/c) 22:50, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
List of Registered Historic Places in Framingham, Massachusetts
Hi, thanks for you help in this, but I wasn't finished cleaning it up. If you will look at the parent article List of Registered Historic Places in Middlesex County, Massachusetts, you will see that the game plan is to link all listings, so editors will see which ones need to be created. It's cool to have other things like the infobox and images in. Let's co-operate in this.clariosophic 22:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for you reply. That's fine, but think about also creating articles for each place. Apparently you have local knowledge of Framingham, which is a big plus. I'm from Newton but live in Florida. clariosophic 22:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Invitation
Boston Red Sox
Image:ALE-Uniform-BOS-Green.PNG Yes, I know of this uniform. However, as it is used only once or twice a year, park anniversary and St. Patrick's Day, I'll keep it out of the infobox image, which displays the primary uniforms, which are used throughout the year. However, I will make a solo image of this uniform that can be put in the uniform section (I can't remember if the Red Sox have one of those or not) where is can be discussed. I'd planned on one day doing that with the practice jerseys. However, it won't be finished right away, so bear with me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silent Wind of Doom (talk • contribs) 05:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Here you go. Unfortunately, the Red Sox do not have a uniforms section, but I'm sure one can be made. The Yankees page has one, if you need a model. This is also the first design to get out that has the new socks. I hope they look okay. That was my biggest worry about doing socks. --Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 04:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Re: Big Classic
There was no content in any of the deleted revisions. Somebody created the page as a test with nonsense in it, then blanked it in their next edit. Feel free to start an article there. :) 68.193.198.41 (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Invitation
Boston Red Sox
Image:ALE-Uniform-BOS-Green.PNG Yes, I know of this uniform. However, as it is used only once or twice a year, park anniversary and St. Patrick's Day, I'll keep it out of the infobox image, which displays the primary uniforms, which are used throughout the year. However, I will make a solo image of this uniform that can be put in the uniform section (I can't remember if the Red Sox have one of those or not) where is can be discussed. I'd planned on one day doing that with the practice jerseys. However, it won't be finished right away, so bear with me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Silent Wind of Doom (talk • contribs) 05:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
- Here you go. Unfortunately, the Red Sox do not have a uniforms section, but I'm sure one can be made. The Yankees page has one, if you need a model. This is also the first design to get out that has the new socks. I hope they look okay. That was my biggest worry about doing socks. --Silent Wind of Doom (talk) 04:23, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
Re: Big Classic
There was no content in any of the deleted revisions. Somebody created the page as a test with nonsense in it, then blanked it in their next edit. Feel free to start an article there. :) 68.193.198.41 (talk) 18:15, 13 December 2007 (UTC)