User talk:Jestet11

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Jestet11, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Jestet11, good luck, and have fun. scope_creep^Talk 18:17, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notability criteria for singers[edit]

Hi @Jestet11: I had to revert your article. Theatre directors and singers comes under WP:CREATIVE and to say he is singer, for example, means has must have international presence on several continents, have charted records on several continents, have created albums and have signed a contract with a publisher and have a large social media presence with millions of fans. Does he have that in singing career? scope_creep^Talk 18:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

He might be a playwright though, if you can prove it with good sources? scope_creep^Talk 18:18, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Yevgeni Ponasenkov, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 19:26, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jestet11: More than half the article references are now Youtube videos, which is unacceptable in a BLP. Also he is not a singer!! Providing a reference that states he is student of a noted opera singer, doesn't make him a singer either. None of these references are really decent. If you can find better references that are not primary or WP:SPS, then it would be ideal. scope_creep^Talk

@Jestet11: I have requested page protection and the help of an admin since you have been edit warring, refuse to communicate and have WP:OWNER problem. scope_creep^Talk 10:32, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Partial block from Yevgeni Ponasenkov[edit]

You have been blocked from editing certain areas of the encyclopedia for a period of one week for disruptive editing. Specifically, edit warring that's coupled with a failure to WP:COMMUNICATE. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 11:11, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Yevgeni Ponasenkov for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yevgeni Ponasenkov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Yevgeni Ponasenkov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

scope_creep^Talk 08:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yevgeni Ponasenkov[edit]

Hi @Jestet11: I removed that work to lede. It's not truthful. I had to two other editors who read and write Russian look at the sources, and just doesn't add up. He is not a historian. Please do not put it back in. Its just WP:PUFF puffing it right out. scope_creep^Talk 08:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep

Of course he is a historian. Let's have a look into the standard Oxford Dictionary:

A historian is «a person who studies or writes about history; an expert in history» (https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/historian?q=historian).Jestet11 (talk) 19:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jestet11: No he isn't. Doesn't have the correct credentials to enable that to be said of him. We discussed it when the article was written amongst several Russian editors and we looked at the evidence or lack there, and it not there. The consensus was that he was a publicist. Do not change it again. scope_creep^Talk 20:03, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep

What do you mean by saying «Doesn't have the correct credentials to enable that to be said of him.»? I don't understand. What kind of evidence did you look at?

Here is a detailed analysis of the director of the Institute of the Russian history at the Russian Academy of Science (the highest institution in Russia) about his work where he is named as historian. (https://phdru.com/mydocs/expert-kolodnikova-ponasenkov-sokolov.pdf)

He was and is being cited by international scientists and historians. :::https://www.societaitalianastoriamilitare.org/quaderni/2017%20Quaderno%20Sism%20Economic%20Warfare.pdf

https://s-space.snu.ac.kr/bitstream/10371/187873/1/000000172016.pdf

https://journals.tsu.ru/engine/download.php?id=228613&area=files

And from linguistic point of view he is a historian. (https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/historian?q=historian</nowiki>)

Are your Russian editors historians? Are they scientists? Did they read the Oxford Dictionary? Jestet11 (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take a look. It has been a couple of years since the article was posted. I will do it tommorrow. I will take a look at that tonight. scope_creep^Talk 20:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've got half a hour so will translate those two documents now and take a look now. scope_creep^Talk 07:20, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It will need to be the in the morning or later afternoon. scope_creep^Talk 07:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't look at it today. Please remind me tomorrow if I don't look at. It was a busy day at work. scope_creep^Talk 20:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Yevgeni Ponasenkov, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 17:45, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Yevgeni Ponasenkov. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 17:46, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]