User talk:JoSePh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

country articles[edit]

Please do not change section heading cases. Check the manual of style. Thanks. --Ragib 22:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

South Africa cleanup[edit]

Unless you give some reasoning as to how or why South Africa needs to be cleaned up, the cleanup template will most likely be removed again. dewet| 13:13, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've been adding the cleanup to a number of articles; usually, if you want to add that, you must motivate it somehow, and preferably on the talk page of the article. In this case, it needs to go on Talk:South Africa. I'll remove the template for now.
Regarding the racial slur, I'm not quite sure that I'm following. How is that relevant to me, or to my question above? Any personal attacks are disallowed according to Wikipedia policy (see WP:NPA for more info), so you should best handle it using those guidelines. dewet| 13:23, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I figured you're somebody of importance to Wikipedia. I also thought language and rudeness like this should be reported. I now there's nothing for you to do, but just thought you should know.

Ah, I see. I'm not really of any importance, just another random editor. I've looked up the edit you mentioned; it was added anonymously by a contributor on dialup/broadband with an IP address pointing to somewhere in Missouri. Sorry, there's not much more I can do. All of the best, dewet| 13:31, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advice: How to use dates on Wikipedia


Please don't change the dates. Most British people and many people internationally write dates as dd/mm/yy, eg, 12 December 1904. Most Americans use mm/dd/yy, eg, December 12 1904. If the article is about an American topic, use mm/dd/yy. If it is a British topic, use dd/mm/yy. If neither, leave it as originally written. Many Americans or British people take offence if an article written about their country and which was written in their local version of English is changed around to a version they don't use. So please do not do that.

All dates usually have two square boxes around them, as in [[12 December]] or [[December 12]]. This means that you can set your preferences (if you look around your screen you'll see the word preferences. Just hit that and follow the instructions) to ensure that you see all dates in the format you want, whether dd/mm/yy, mm/dd/yy or yyyy-mm-dd. The general rules on how Wikipedia articles are written can be seen in our Wikipedia:Manual of Style. Type in WP:MS and you'll see the page.

If you have any queries about all this, just ask anyone on Wikipedia and they will help you. Enjoy your time on the web's fastest growing encyclopædia (or encyclopedia, if you write it that way!). Thank you.

Please don't change dates on Irish articles to US-style dating. Ireland uses the international dd/mm/yyyy format. Any changes will simply be reverted. FearÉIREANN\(caint) 21:41, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Long Beach, California[edit]

Why did you copy the City Infobox from Los Angeles, California to Long Beach, California, but not correct most of the data? BlankVerse 23:48, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to change everything on the infobox to Long Beach, but I had computer problems yesterday and did not finish. I'll definately get back to it ASAP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User talk:JoSePh (talkcontribs)
note: you should 'sign' your posts with four tildes, like this: ~~~~
You added the city flag for Long Beach, Mississippi to the Long Beach, California infobox, which I've now deleted. I did a quick look, but couldn't find a copy of the LB, CAL flag. The city seal also needs replacing because I'm pretty sure that the current one is a historical version which has been recently been updated. BlankVerse 05:10, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful making changes to articles about cities you're not familiar with. The changes you made to the Glendale, California infobox were incorrect. Glendale has a council-manager government where the city is governed by the City Council. The "mayor" is not an elected office, but rotates annually among the elected members of the City Council. Aside from chairing council meetings, the mayor's duties are ceremonial. Mike Dillon 22:28, 28 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To answer your question[edit]

Yes, I attened Annapolis high school from 2002-2006, when I graduated.BoBoCTiberius 00:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy, I noticed that you and I seem to post in one or two articles dealing with progressive issues in political science/sociology. There's currently a debate beginning in Boston Tea Party as to whether the article should include the category [1]. It meets definitions set in the articles Terrorism and Definition of terrorism, however, there are several self-proclaimed patriots who watch BTP who refuse to recognise the fact. The simple criteria for terrorism generally seem to be intimidation or destruction of property in order to change public policy or public opinion while a state of war has not yet been declared. Some users would rather use recent acts of terrorism as a yardstick, rather than using a firm definition, and hence lose their ability to discuss matters calmly. Would you be able to pop in to the Talk page and join in the discussion? Thanks much, samwaltz 05:37, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest in the article, and for the nice picture. I removed it though because it was improperly linked and didn't appear to have anything to do with the section it was linked in. If you want to try again, maybe put it in a different section of the article and try the code example I've included here so it'll show up more like you wanted.--Rosicrucian 07:49, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded this image and tagged it with {{PD-release}} - which indicates you have the copyright holder's permission to release it. If this is the case you need to provide supporting evidence for this. If you took the photo you can change the license to {{PD-self}} and state that it is your own work in the image summary. If this is the case for other images you've uploaded you may want to consider changing their tags as well. Best wishes. Madmedea 10:30, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Mayorpow.jpg[edit]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mayorpow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk 02:16, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Baermaxcutkirkpic.jpeg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Baermaxcutkirkpic.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 07:43, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:67210736.jpg[edit]

Image:67210736.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:TrafficLights-HagerstownMD.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:TrafficLights-HagerstownMD.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 21:16, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:County adminbldg02-plaza.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:County adminbldg02-plaza.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:02, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you[edit]

The article you created, List_of_African_golfers maybe deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

  1. List the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
  2. You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
  3. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
    Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept. Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
  4. You can vote to merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 03:12, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I've tagged the above-named file for speedy deletion because it's a copyright violation with no clear indication of fair use. It was copied directly from the City of Baltimore's website (which includes a copyright notice). Unless some assertion of fair use is made, the file will be deleted. Esrever (klaT) 11:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Aa12g5e.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Aa12g5e.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 13:20, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Bild spruch 1.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Bild spruch 1.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly hi! 18:27, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Houses04-victorian.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Houses04-victorian.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.state.ky.us/agencies/finance/engineering/HistoricProperties/HistoricSites/BerryHillMansion.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —innotata 02:58, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Street01.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Street01.jpg, which you've attributed to http://www.beyonddc.com/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:11, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Us-md-aa.gif listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Us-md-aa.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 23:39, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]