User talk:Joe Circus

"Where are the Clowns?" Joe Circus (talk) 19:39, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"All the world's a circus ... and all the men & women merely clowns." --Wm. Shakespeare Joe Circus (talk) 03:56, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"If I had a penny for every clown in the world, I'd be a billionaire." --Wm. Shakespeare Joe Circus (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And to further clarify Shakespeare's opinion: "All the world a circus ... and all the men & women merely clowns ... except for those WHO are ... D O G S." Joe Circus (talk) 21:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment added to Circumcision talk page[edit]

Just to let you know, I've placed the comment you made with this edit [1] to the circumcision talk page in its own section as it did not seem to relate to the discussion to which you added it. Hope you'll understand. Beejaypii (talk) 00:54, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding that comment, if you make those kinds of personal attacks again, I'll block you. And don't bother feigning ignorance - just move on. If you use this as an opportunity to continue the attacks under the guise of trying to "understand" what I'm referring to, I'll also block you, because I'm sick and tired of these off-Wikipedia campaigns. By the way, did you have a previous Wikipedia account, and if so, what was it? Jayjg ^(talk) 05:46, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, for those reading, Jayjg is referring to Joe Circus and a comment he posted on the circumcision article talk page, referenced in this section's title, and not to the comment I posted above or to me. I think it's a little ambiguous at first sight due to the existence of two possible referents of the word comment and the exclusive use of the personal pronoun you in Jayjg's contribution (that's not meant as criticism, just an observation). Beejaypii (talk) 19:51, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, to be clear, I was referring to Joe Circus' comments, not Beejaypii's. Jayjg ^(talk) 19:55, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for attempting to harass other users, as you did at Talk:Circumcision. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jayjg ^(talk) 18:00, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Next time you restore that section, or harass that editor again, the block will be a week. Jayjg ^(talk) 18:01, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you restore that harassment material to your Talk: page again, I'll revoke your Talk: page rights too. If people want to see what was removed, they can look in the history of the article's Talk: page. Jayjg ^(talk) 19:30, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest professional help for your ego problems. Joe Circus (talk) 21:11, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:36, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You've also had your Talk: page privileges removed, because you continue to your Talk: page to harass and attack that editor. The purpose of Wikipedia is to create an encyclopedia, not to pursue vendettas and campaigns against a Wikipedia editor. If you do this again after your one week block is up, your next block will be for a month. Focus on article content, not that editor (or any other). Jayjg ^(talk) 23:41, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joe, keep up the good work exposing their rigged consensus. 12.72.149.104 (talk) 16:12, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jayjg should not be the admin blocking you since he is an involved editor on Circumcision. If there were transgressions they should have been brought up at wp:ANI. Garycompugeek (talk) 22:12, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joe Circus. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 20:14, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joe Circus. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 18:20, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are indefinitely blocked for repeatedly sockpuppeting. You've been given at least three chances, and you've evaded your block and puppeted again and again. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 18:20, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]