User talk:Joeblanc98

This is Joeblanc98's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

|- |

Welcome Joeblanc98!

Now that you've joined Wikipedia, there are 47,471,927 users!

Hello, Joeblanc98. Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions! I'm Sillybillypiggy, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge. Sillybillypiggy

Some pages of helpful information to get you started:

Introduction to Wikipedia

The five pillars of Wikipedia

Editing tutorial

How to edit a page

Manual of style

The basics of Wikicode

How to develop an article

How to create an article

Help pages

What Wikipedia is not

Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:

Do be bold

Do assume good faith

Do be civil

Do keep cool!

Do maintain a neutral point of view

Don't spam

Don't infringe copyright

Don't vandalize

Don't get blocked

If you need further help, you can:

Ask a question

or even:

Ask an experienced editor to "adopt" you

Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.

There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:

Fight vandalism

Be a WikiFairy or a WikiGnome

Help contribute to articles

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Help design new templates

Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.

The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun!
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put {{My sandbox}} on your user page. Seeing as you haven't created a user page yet, simply click here to start it.

Sincerely, sillybillypiggy^{¡SIGN NOW OR ELSE!} 12:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC) (Leave me a message)[reply]

Note:Add Your Messages at down bottom

sillybillypiggy^{¡SIGN NOW OR ELSE!} 12:36, 20 December 2011 (UTC) thanks you[reply]

List of Bakugan: Mechtanium Surge episodes[edit]

Please read the talk page. Matty-chan (talk) 15:00, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TeletoonJoeblanc2011[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TeletoonJoeblanc2011 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche ☽☾Talk 02:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from TeletoonJoeblanc2011, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 02:48, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ferret (talk) 17:31, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Also, please refrain from creating blank edit request pages. Hazard-SJ ㋡ 04:24, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit autoconfirmed]

Caution[edit]

Hi, I am an administrator on English Wikipedia. You seem to be very enthusiastic about certain topics, and that's great! We really love editors to be bold about improving articles. However, after reviewing a bunch of your edits, I must say that a lot of them are not constructive, and they haven't really improved the articles you edited. I highly encourage you to read through Wikipedia's policies before making further edits, especially those listed above in the Welcome box User:Sillybillypiggy posted. Please, if you are not sure if your edit will be cool, ask! Most editors, myself included, are more than happy to answer civilly phrased questions. I also think you should absolutely refrain from editing any Templates, as you recently did on Template:Edit semi-protected. If you want to play around and see how to change stuff, you can create your own personal sandbox at User:Joeblanc98/Sandbox, or you can use the public sandbox at WP:Sandbox. You can do pretty much whatever you want on those pages. If you need any advice, feel free to leave a message at User talk:Aervanath for me.

I am writing this because I don't want your editing privileges to be revoked, which I or another administrator will do if we find that you are not here to truly improve Wikipedia. Take this as friendly advice, please. I don't want to drive away an enthusiastic new editor! Welcome, and contribute constructively! Cheers, Aervanath (talk) 06:49, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you will be taken more seriously by other editors if you use proper punctuation and grammar, etc. This edit you made is almost unintelligible. --Aervanath (talk) 17:38, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have to echo what Aervanath has said, since after you received this warning you once again edited {{edit semi-protected}}, this time inserting a template loop. Please don't edit any templates until you've read the available information and tested in a sandbox. Templates employ different syntax than normal wikitext and making a single change to a template can affect multiple other articles that are transcluding it. If you need help or want some guidance on how to work with templates, feel free to ask on my talk page or on the talk page of whichever template you want to edit. Thanks for understanding. — Bility (talk) 09:24, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, in his defense, he made that edit 2 hours before I posted the above. But I'm glad he now has multiple editors willing to help him out! --Aervanath (talk) 17:43, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

upload on Wikipedia

Your recent editing history at List of Naruto: Shippuden episodes (season 11) shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 18:45, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last and only warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Talk:List of Yu-Gi-Oh! GX episodes (season 1). Soliloquial^talk 00:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This template may not be removed while you're blocked. Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 05:27, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Toddst1 (talk) 23:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeblanc98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here 98 (talk) 23:45, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 00:04, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not modify declined requests. Kuru (talk) 01:50, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you do it again, your talk page access will be revoked for the duration of the block. Favonian (talk) 23:04, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indefinitely[edit]

Because you used a sockpuppet to evade your block, you are now blocked indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 16:55, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeblanc98 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept Unblock request

Decline reason:

No grounds for unblock provide. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.