User talk:Joeconsumer

License tagging for Image:TrussTubeDob.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:TrussTubeDob.jpeg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Some advice on the image since it will help the page Dobsonian telescope, and its something I know about from 10 years in the news/graphics business (can you say checkered career? ;^)). Commercial companies specifically restrict use of their images in any editorial use... even basic news because they make them strictly for promotion. An editorial article may not be promotion of a product.... it may even be detrimental or derogatory. That is probably why there is no good tag to use a commercial image (I have banged my head against this my self asking "WHY CANT I SCAN IN A QUESTAR AD PIC?!?!?!?!?!?!?" till I though back to what I have seen on AP image service "to be used ONLY with stories about the specific product"). The best tag I have seen is Fair use in|article (add tag code to work). The problem is it wont pass "Where no free equivalent is available or could be created that would adequately give the same information".... there is a free equivalent available--->

Dobsonian telescope edits[edit]

Good addition to the page but there are a few problems fact and encyclopedic wise. A section is titled "Second Generation “Truss Tube” Dobsonians" but describes commercial adaptations instead of describing the designs in the amateur telescope making world where Dobsonians were really developed. Second Generation “Truss Tube” Dobsonians were not "invented" in 1989. Many existed way before then. And is there proof of a clearly demarked "Second Generation" and not just an evolution ^{[citation needed]}? A better title for that whole section would probably be "Continued Evolution of the design" and it should be re-writen to describe those evolved designs and not commercial adaptations. Info on commercial adaptations could go under a sub heading titled "Commercial adaptations". Statements like "Truss Tube Dobsonians are the largest commercially available telescopes available to amateur astronomers" need to be backed up by references. The info is all good and a worthy addition IMHO, it just needs a little cleanup to make it more encyclopedic. Halfblue 15:54, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Vigo The Carpathian.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vigo The Carpathian.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:35, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Vigo the Carpathian.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vigo the Carpathian.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:56, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Key System Logo.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Key System Logo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Key System Map.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Key System Map.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Building (June 15)[edit]

NOTE: really nice work, it's just that we don't approve drafts to replace existing articles, but instead ask that you integrate your content into the existing article about this building. You've done a great job, no diss intended, just as a procedural thing we don't swap drafts in for existing functional articles. Please let me know if you have any troubles integrating your content into the existing page Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Building. MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:57, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Building. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Building and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Joeconsumer, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 10:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Building (1949) has been accepted[edit]

Golden State Mutual Life Insurance Building (1949), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:52, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Herbert M. Baruch Corporation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mayfair Hotel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 22 January[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Hercules, California page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Key System Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Key System Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]