User talk:John Gell

Welcome![edit]

Hello, John Gell, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 02:10, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Chhachh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hazara

Sirka, Pakistan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pashtun

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Behbudi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pashtun

Garhi Matani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Abdali

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Attock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jand

Jand Tehsil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jand

Lawrencepur, Punjab, Pakistan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Baba

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nawab Bahadur Khan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muhammad Ali I for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muhammad Ali I is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muhammad Ali I until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 12:53, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Fateh Muhammad Khan for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fateh Muhammad Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fateh Muhammad Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 12:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hello, another editor has filed a sockpuppet investigation case about your connection with other accounts. I'd appreciate it if you could provide some comments in response to the allegations. You might like the review the guide to responding in an SPI first. Thank you, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:59, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Callanecc ! Why I am nominated for this? I didn't misuse my account and IP address and I am not connected with other accounts. My editing is almost right. All my created pages has citations. Please remove my name from this nomination. Thanks! John Gell (talk) 09:17, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please have a look at the evidence which has been presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MUHAMMAD SAFIULLAH and provide some comments in the "Comments by other users" section about why the evidence which has been presented isn't correct. Thank you, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:25, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:MUHAMMAD SAFIULLAH per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MUHAMMAD SAFIULLAH. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:12, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Callanecc:! Can you please tell me that how you blocked me? As it is not proved. I think that you didn't read my comments deeply on investigation page before blocking me.

@Callanecc:! I think that you simply copied template on my talk page which out understanding my view and request. It is not proved that I have more than one accounts. I think that there is no benefit to me even requesting through this unblock template as I am blocked even after the answering (I have no other account) of all questions that asked to me on investigation page. I request to you please read my answers deeply on investigation page and also reply me. Thanks! John Gell (talk) 12:19, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As I said on the SPI page, the explanation you provided does not adequately explain the connection between yourself and Wiki.Olyer6. It also doesn't seem to adequately explain the significant amount of the knowledge you had when you started editing, nor now after you were listed in the SPI. Requesting an unblock has the added benefit of another person reviewing the evidence but you will also need to address the connection between yourself and Wiki.Olyer6. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:26, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Callanecc:! Ok Sir... I will request for unblocking but why I will need to address the connection between me and Wiki.Olyer6 as I already said on investigation page and my talk page that I have no connection with any other account. And it is also not proved from anywhere that I have a connection with Wiki.Olyer6.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John Gell (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am John Gell, I am here from at least three months. I was editing Wikipedia in good manner and also started many projects such as Wikipedia:WikiProject Attock settlements and Wikipedia:WikiProject Bahawalpur State and created many articles under these projects. But unfortunately before 2 to 3 days, a wiki editor opened a SPI investigation against me on the basis that I and some others editors made edits on same pages. On investigation page I was also invited. I gave my point of view and also answered all questions asked by wikipedians (you can see that). Important point is that the IP addresses of these wikipedians and mine are different. And also my editing percentage and method is totally different from them. Today, a administrator blocked me but he also admitted on Comments section for administrators of investigation page that it has no prove that I have any connection with "Wiki.Olyer6" user (base of my blocking). I request to you please check out this matter and unblocked me. Thanks! John Gell (talk) 13:51, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

How do you know the IP addresses are different? You misrepresent the results of the SPI: "Mix between possible and likely" is hardly "no proof of any connection". Huon (talk) 17:30, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.