User talk:Jpross123

Welcome

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent edits, such as the ones to the page Crundale, do not conform to our policies. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the "sandbox" rather than in articles.

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia.

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Matt J ^User|Talk 17:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Shacc boyz, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. →Gƒoley Four (GSV) 02:52, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent mention that the page needs to be deleted[edit]

I noticed you recently mentioned that Shacc boyz needs to be deleted and blanked the page. Unfortunately, that also removed the {{db-person}} tag which indicates that admins need to come and delete it. (The tag looks like a big red banner at the top of the article.) When you see pages that need immediate deletion, you can read about what to do in WP:CSD. Good luck! Reaper Eternal (talk) 02:53, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Provincial Reconstruction Team[edit]

Hi. I reverted your recent edit to Provincial Reconstruction Team because a negative statement about a living person must be verified by a citation to a reliable source. Please see WP:BLP for more information regarding editing biographical information. Thank Susfele (talk) 03:01, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think what happened is an IP editor inserted vandalism and then removed it, which confused Jpross into thinking the IP was removing valid content. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Joseph Stella constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Grey Matter (talk) 21:52, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:09, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies[edit]

Hey that's perfectly alright, it wasn't your fault. One thing you should sign your posts by typing four '~' after you've wrote something like you did to me, its just more convenient for people. If there's anything you need or wanna know feel free to ask me. Regards Grey Matter (talk) 02:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your website[edit]

Just saying, your website/forum has three validation errors. You might want to check them out. And welcome! —MC10 (T•C•GB•L) 02:37, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Complete Singles[edit]

Hello Jpross123. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Complete Singles, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article contained content until blanked, not by its author and without adequate explanation. No adequate reason to speedy. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 15:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of School Bus Web[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on School Bus Web requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:05, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Daily Campus for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Daily Campus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daily Campus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chances last a finite time (talk) 14:10, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]