User talk:K of the net

Skilled Group[edit]

I made clerical fixes to your recent edit to Skilled Group. I also opened a discussion on the article's talk page recommending that the link be removed altogether. See Talk:Skilled Group#Labour brokering. According to Labour brokering, this refers to a very specific labor practice that happens in South Africa. Since Skilled Group does not operate in that country, the link to Labour brokering in the "See also" section is not appropriate. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:35, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AGF[edit]

Hi there! Please keep in mind that edits such as this one isn't really positive for the project. If you have a problem with any of my edits to the article, please be specific, and/or report me to eg. WP:AN. If not, please be civil, assume good faith and contribute to articles instead of trying to accuse other editors of bad faith! Bjelleklang - talk 22:21, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep things on a professional level[edit]

If you have an axe to grind as it relates to a company's off-wiki behavior, please keep it off-wiki. Edits like this are not helpful in building an encyclopedia. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:40, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Skilled Group court cases[edit]

Please compile the court cases together and write a coherent paragraph, and limit yourself to the 2 or 3 court cases whose outcomes were the most "important." List the remaining ones on the article's talk page.

Also, the best ways to list court cases in an article is either "in-line" as in:

Important civil rights cases include ''[http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/483/case.html Brown v. Board of Education]''...

In-line, as a citation:

Important civil rights cases include ''Brown. v. Board of Education'',<ref>{{cite court |litigants=Brown v. Board of Education |vol= |reporter= |opinion= |pinpoint= |court= |date= |url= |accessdate= |quote=}}</ref> ....

As a list:

Important civil rights cases include:

''[http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/347/483/case.html Brown v. Board of Education]''...
...
...

Note: The examples above are surrounded with "nowiki" so the WikiCode shows. When used properly, without the "nowiki," they will display properly. See {{cite court}} for instructions on using that template.

Again, please don't "stuff" the article with lots of court cases, only list the ones whose ultimate outcome either directly affected society the most (e.g. precedent-setting appellate- or Supreme-Court-level cases) or those which affected the company the most. You can put additional court cases on the article talk page. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 17:20, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]