User talk:KaiserAllen

October 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Firefly. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Amber Heard have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. firefly ( t · c ) 09:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Monica Cox, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Isabelle ^🔔 17:32, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Scaachi Koul. Citing (talk) 20:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe admit that she is racist and deserves to be called as such. KaiserAllen (talk) 13:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Citing (talk) 17:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Eric Swalwell. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Calling him "xenophobic" is not neutral, accurate, or acceptable. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Since you've already been warned adequately before about editing BLPs, you need to read this and comply. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:31, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 16:42, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice: gender-related controversies and post-1992 American politics[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

--Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:07, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm TheCartoonEditor. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Renaissance (BeyoncÃ© album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheCartoonEditor_{(he/him/they)} (talk) (contribs) 03:18, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

tually given your previous block and warnings here, consider this your only warning. If you vandalize or create another BLP violation, I will request an indefinite block of your account.c PICKLEDICAE🥒 14:03, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]