User talk:Kbelltrium

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Kbelltrium, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 07:09, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Kenneth froewiss[edit]

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Kenneth froewiss, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://w4.stern.nyu.edu/faculty/facultyindex.cgi?id=267. As a copyright violation, Kenneth froewiss appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Kenneth froewiss has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Kenneth froewiss and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Kenneth froewiss with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Kenneth froewiss.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ttonyb1 (talk) 15:50, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Tpugel.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Tpugel.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Peripitus (Talk) 01:03, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Lzicklin.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Lzicklin.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Frédéric Dalsace[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Frédéric Dalsace, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Biography of a living person (WP:BLP) that does not explicate why it is notable (WP:NOTABILITY)

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 20:19, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:TRIUM logo.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:TRIUM logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:FDalsace.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:FDalsace.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:17, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Smarciano.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Smarciano.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Dgode.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Dgode.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^(talk) 20:03, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Dgode.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Dgode.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^(talk) 20:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009[edit]

Please refrain from uploading disruptive images with no encyclopedic value. It is considered vandalism. Thank you. — neuro^(talk) 20:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Yermak[edit]

According to our rules, the article is to be titled with just his name, not with (finance professor) added. We only add a distinguishing designator when there is more than one person of the same name. Additionally, it needs some additional information, such as his awards and major publications. Please add them right away. Please read WP:PROF for an indication of what is wanted. DGG (talk) 04:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Asaunders.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Asaunders.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 15:23, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to List of New York University alumni, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability and the content has been removed. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Wikipedia is never an acceptable source for itself. Noetic Sage 21:34, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Eelton.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Eelton.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Mbrenner.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Mbrenner.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Kfroewis.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Kfroewis.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Rsylla.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Rsylla.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Ezemel.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Ezemel.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Eelton.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Eelton.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^{(talk)(review)} 08:30, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Menachem Brenner[edit]

A tag has been placed on Menachem Brenner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Cabe 6403 ^{(Talk•Sign)} 14:33, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

advice[edit]

It is not going to be deleted, but it needs some fixing. Give proper quotations in standard format for articles and book chapters, and separate the books from the journals. The reason for full bibliographic references is that it is otherwise impossible to tell if they are scholarly articles in peer reviewed journals and otherwise they do not count towards notability. Lectures at conferences do not count, and should not normally be even mentioned. Summarize the main consultant activities, and if at all possible give some third party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not blogs or press releases, or material derived from press releases. I adjusted some of the other material to meet our standards and conventions. DGG (talk) 23:39, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In general you ought to pay more attention to WP:PROF, and discussions on faculty based on it. It is usually impossible to show notability for an Assistant Professor unless they are extremely distinguished at an early stage in their career. I shall probably challenge many of these articles, and I doubt very much that they will stand-Associate Professors too are often challenged, though I will usually let someone else challenge them. They do not stand a good deal of the time-even for first rate schools like Stern. Adjunct faculty must usually rely for notability on their notability in their primary career, in this case according to WP:BIO. You c=can nd shouldlook out for people atthe school who have material written about them in newspapers and professional publications. that's what really helps the articles.

And there's some important points of style: We only use the title Professor or Doctor once, in the lede sentence of the article. Afterwards, we just use he or she with an occasional use of the last name alone at the start of major sections. We do not write in outline format, except for lists of publications, and sometimes, for lists of prizes. We certainly dont do this for a sequence of positions or consultancies. that's CV style, and violates WP:NOT. Editors in chief of journals are significant positions and establish notability. Membership on editorial boards sometimes helps, if the membership is selective. Being a reviewer is trivial and should not be included. Being a member of major professional societies is worth mentioning if the society is selective, but only offices of national level or higher are really significant enough for notability. Hobbies are not, unless there's some actual distinction in them. Incidentally, awards within the college are considered unimportant, except possibly for something of special distinction at the highest level. Ditto for undergraduate awards, and usually most graduate ones. It's better not to even mention them. If it doesn't make an impressive article without the student accomplishments, the person might not be notable. On the other hand, if they do have grants, and the amount of money is impressive, it can be included. Names of doctoral students who have later done enough to have Wikipedia articles are also appropriate content. It's good, though, to always include the names of all colleges and the high school, if known, because it adds to the notability of those institutions. Birth date and birthplace are considered essential, though you can just give the year if you think it preferable.

For articles and books, it's important to show how much they have been cited. If you don't know how to get this data, ask a librarian. It's critical usually, for showing they are an authority in the profession.

When you enter articles on all the faculty indiscriminately, people wonder about the degree to which this represents WP:Conflict of interest. Start at the top level, and wait there until they get accepted. And please do not submit photographs without explicit copyright licensing. Make sure you actually own the copyright when you do that, or have explicit permission from whoever does. See see our FAQ about organisations, which applies to articles like these. I am one of the most sympathetic Wikipedia administrators to people in the academic world, and i need to tell you that what you are doing is not appropriate. Hope this helps, but if you'd like more help ask here, or on my talk page, or email me from my talk page. DGG (talk) 00:05, 2 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Jcarpenter.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Jcarpenter.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Aljungqvist.gif[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Aljungqvist.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:50, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jenn Carpenter[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jenn Carpenter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. tedder (talk) 18:25, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Jennifer Carpenter (academic)[edit]

I have nominated Jennifer Carpenter (academic), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Carpenter (academic). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. DreamGuy (talk) 14:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Frédéric Dalsace[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Frédéric Dalsace, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frédéric Dalsace. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Abductive (reasoning) 22:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possible conflict of interest[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article TRIUM EMBA, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Qwfp (talk) 14:31, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:MSGF logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:MSGF logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:05, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:NYU AIF lockup.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:NYU AIF lockup.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:05, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TRIUM logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TRIUM logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Master of Science in Risk Management Program for Executives[edit]

The article Master of Science in Risk Management Program for Executives has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promo for an executive education program that fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 20:33, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]