User talk:Kevo327/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1 Archive 2

Administrators' newsletter – September 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2022).

Guideline and policy news

  • A discussion is open to define a process by which Vector 2022 can be made the default for all users.
  • An RfC is open to gain consensus on whether Fox News is reliable for science and politics.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • An arbitration case regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing has been closed. The Arbitration Committee passed a remedy as part of the final decision to create a request for comment (RfC) on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion (AfD).
  • The arbitration case request Jonathunder has been automatically closed after a 6 month suspension of the case.

Miscellaneous

  • The new pages patrol (NPP) team has prepared an appeal to the Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) for assistance with addressing Page Curation bugs and requested features. You are encouraged to read the open letter before it is sent, and if you support it, consider signing it. It is not a discussion, just a signature will suffice.
  • Voting for candidates for the Wikimedia Board of Trustees is open until 6 September.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:12, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Armenian prisoners of the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Sennecaster (Chat) 15:12, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

Administrators' newsletter – October 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Articles for creation helper script now automatically recognises administrator accounts which means your name does not need to be listed at WP:AFCP to help out. If you wish to help out at AFC, enable AFCH by navigating to Preferences → Gadgets and checking the "Yet Another AfC Helper Script" box.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2022

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2022).

CheckUser changes

removed TheresNoTime

Oversight changes

removed TheresNoTime

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new preference named "Enable limited width mode" has been added to the Vector 2022 skin. The preference is also shown as a toggle on every page if your monitor is 1600 pixels or wider. When disabled it removes the whitespace added by Vector 2022 on the left and right of the page content. Disabling this preference has the same effect as enabling the wide-vector-2022 gadget. (T319449)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

GAN for Science

Hi Kevo, I've boldly delisted your GAN for the science article without failing it as it appears to be a drive-by nomination. You have only 6 edits to the article so I'm concerned you may not have sufficient familiarity with it to be able to engage with a reviewer and make sure it meets the GA standards. On top of that you've been minimally active lately so I'm not sure you would be able to respond to a review in a timely manner. No prejudice against a renomination if you return and engage further with the article in the future. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:16, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on 1989 in animation

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 1989 in animation, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:34, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

Administrator changes

added Novem Linguae
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed MBisanz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Salyan

Hello, Kevo327,

I think it was a mistake to bundle so many articles together in an AFD nomination. This is not an opinion of whether they should be Kept, Merged, Redirected or Deleted, this is not my opinion on the articles or the fact that the page creator wasn't extended-confirmed. It's my opinion based on closing hundreds of AFD discussions. Unless the articles are virtually identical, it's very very difficult to arrive at a consensus of what to do with them all. One editor might advocate deleting one but keeping two others, another editor might say "Keep all" or "Delete all" because they don't have the time to examine each article thoroughly. You can expect this discussion to be relisted, probably more than once.

So, I have a couple of suggestions you might want to consider. Withdraw the entire AFD nomination and then nominate, individual, the articles you find most unacceptable. OR, keep the nomination but reduce the number of articles to a manageable number like 3-5 articles that participants can realistically spend time reviewing. Or, you can just continue forward but unless there is an unexpected wave of editors who see things exactly the way you see them, expect this nomination to be open until later in July.

Just some thoughts I had looking over this AFD. Good luck! Liz Read! Talk! 07:35, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello Liz, thanks for the feedback! I have applied your suggestion to reduce the number of articles. Do you think the AFD nomination looks better now? - Kevo327 (talk) 11:05, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Russian Revolution

Thank you so much for fixing the journal citation error. I was struggling for quite some time to figure out what was wrong. I appreciate your help in fixing the citation. Best regards


FictiousLibrarian (talk). 04:00, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Reward board entry for reference errors/ bare URLs

pinging Edward-Woodrow, i have approximately 1650 lifetime edits on CS1 error fixes (verified here), and these are only the ones i've kept track of by mentioning CS or CS1 error in the edit summary, I've also done 250 (255 to be exact) CS1 error fixing edits after your RB entry (for fairness). - Kevo327 (talk) 22:43, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Reward board

File:CleanupBarnstar.PNG File:Citation Barnstar Hires.png
The Multiple Barnstar
Two barnstars for outstanding work! (Re: Reward Board) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 23:40, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
  • On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded.
  • Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate:
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Harts unem

Discord kam tenc ban duk unek vor yes karanam dzez het khosam? Shat hartser unem dzez tal AmanAmanAmaTurq (talk) 15:47, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

added Firefangledfeathers
removed

Interface administrator changes

added Novem Linguae

Technical news

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Blockade of the Republic of Artsakh (2022–present)

Thank you for leaving an edit summary on your recent edit on Blockade of the Republic of Artsakh (2022–present). However, I strongly disagree with your revert. By suggesting that you reverted to the last "stable" edit, you are suggesting the editing, was, unstable? I feel that the claims that the lede needs to be completely restructured and that there are evidently many words that are not NPOV to be perfectly valid claims, hence the templates added at the front. Three different editors have recently agreed that the article has neutrality issues, and it has been written in large parts by editors who are emotionally attached to the subject to say the least. I quite frankly don't understand the revert, as all of the content removal was explained in the edit summary.
Also, keep in mind I was being bold. It's going to take way too much time discussing the addition of every single citation on an article with over 500 sources (WP:REFBOMB and citation overkill, by the way). Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:52, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

@Paul Vaurie Citations/maintenance edits are one thing and as I said in my comment, it can be restored anytime (unfortunately it was part of overall edits). And I don't see "three editors" on the talk, if you refer to this discussion [1], I don't see you commenting further and the supposed third editor (Tanz768) isn't allowed to edit in the topic area. Please comment on the talk page [2] about specific things you want to edit and gain consensus first, the latter is very important as there is alot of dispute in this topic area and you can be certain anything contentious is going to be challenged or discussed. Also please check archives for good measure, alot of the things may very well be discussed already and have consensus. - Kevo327 (talk) 06:59, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Kevo327. Thank you. —NMW03 (talk) 22:55, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Revert

Instead of reverting perfectly valid and explained (in edit summary) edits, I would prefer that you left a message on the talk page of the article first yourself. My edits were not unexplained and made perfect sense in accordance with WP:UNDUE (prominence of placement) and MOS:DATED. Paul Vaurie (talk) 06:56, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

@Paul Vaurie thank you for the message, but I'm afraid you're mistaken here – it is relevant to the conflict. I'll explain why later today most likely. - Kevo327 (talk) 07:10, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but, no, it's really not. The NKAO is not relevant to the conflict itself directly. Having UNDUE wording that relates to arguments made by sides during the conflict to justify their "ownership" of the land has no place in the lede. Let's be honest, that's the only reason the population is mentioned in the lede. To prove a point. I could not find another former Soviet autonomous oblast that mentions the oblast's historical population within the opening three sentences. Paul Vaurie (talk) 07:16, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
It's a clear violation of WP:UNDUE "prominence of placement". The demographics of the former oblast are clearly mentioned in that section, where they belong. Paul Vaurie (talk) 07:17, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
@Paul Vaurie "no other former Soviet autonomous oblast has such a sentence in the lede" – the problem with this is NKAO isn't comparable to other oblasts because of the conflict context. The only other Oblast comparable is the South Ossetian Autonomous Oblast, which in fact has population demographics in lead, while it's more heterogeneous than NK Oblast. The rest of SSR Oblasts are mostly Russian SSR, and which have been mostly dismantled in the 20s or 30s. - Kevo327 (talk) 15:13, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
@Kevo327: Sorry, but, no, the context of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict is irrelevant. Giving the population is a WP:UNDUE violation. Paul Vaurie (talk) 15:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
@Paul Vaurie That is just your subjective opinion, there is nothing undue about it especially if we take into account all the context and similar oblast article having same info in the lead [3], which you said no other oblasts had. It's too obvious that it can't be deleted, particularly when it isn't even controversial. The Oblast is a historic entity, it isn't a current event that might or might not change. The reader as it stands wouldn't even guess that it was an ethnically Armenian Oblast, the cultural identity of a region is at least as relevant in the lead as the administrative info is. Particularly when a significant notability, including news coverage of the region IS about the Armenian population. Also please take a note that it was in the article for literally more than a decade [4].
You ought to achieve consensus for removing something like this which has been in the article for a very long time, currently you don't have consensus. Please self-revert and discuss further if you still disagree. - Kevo327 (talk) 16:06, 19 August 2023 (UTC)
@Paul Vaurie To add, if there was no ethnic group contrasting with Azerbaijan's SRR, the Oblast wouldn't have been created... mentioning which ethnic group it is in the lede is the least we could do. - Kevo327 (talk) 16:11, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion closed

Hi Kevo327, I've closed the AE thread regarding your conduct. One of the things which came up during the discussion was that you have made personalised comments to other editors when you're in disputes with them [5] [6]. This conduct is not acceptable and if it's continued it will very likely result in sanctions. You may appeal this warning using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:44, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
  • A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2023 Nagorno-Karabakh clashes

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023 Nagorno-Karabakh clashes, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:20, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Kevo327. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 14:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Please acknowledge receipt when you have a chance. Thanks. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 14:21, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2023 Nagorno-Karabakh clashes

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023 Nagorno-Karabakh clashes, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:14, 25 September 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2023 Nagorno-Karabakh clashes

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023 Nagorno-Karabakh clashes, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:31, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Request

Hello.

There are news in Azerbaijani and Turkish news websites, that Khojaly (town) came under Azerbaijani control on September 24, 2023. Azerbaijani Armed Forces gave advance notice to all Armenians living in Khojaly to leave, and after the Armenians fled, Khojaly came under Azerbaijani control.

Also according to Azerbaijani and Turkish news websites, the towns of Martuni and Martakert came under Azerbaijani control today on September 26, 2023, after all Armenians fled.

Can you find neutral non-Azerbaijani/non-Turkish/non-Russian/non-Armenian sources about these? I couldn't find news from neutral sources.

Yours sincerely, 31.200.11.174 (talk) 18:17, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

WikiProject Artsakh revival

hey, i've seen you on the talk pages of a bunch of articles about the recent events in Artsakh, & i thought you might be interested in working on WikiProject Artsakh! great work :) Sawyer-mcdonell (talk) 01:51, 1 October 2023 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open regarding amending the paid-contribution disclosure policy to add the following text: Any administrator soliciting clients for paid Wikipedia-related consulting or advising services not covered by other paid-contribution rules must disclose all clients on their userpage.

Technical news

  • Administrators can now choose to add the user's user page to their watchlist when changing the usergroups for a user. This works both via Special:UserRights and via the API. (T272294)

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Email

Hi - thanks for your email, it was potentially helpful. If there are any more diffs or article histories you would like to draw to my attention, please feel free to send them on. Best Girth Summit (blether) 18:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Good bye I guess

Wow, I didn't expect you to get arbcom blocked. I really appreciated your work on this site, so it's pretty sad to see you get screwed over by some shadowy commitee of admins. Hope you're ok, and that you'll find other meaningful things to do. —Trilletrollet [ Talk | Contribs ] 01:57, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom blocked

ArbCom logo

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-en@wikimedia.org).

Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

Izno (talk) 17:40, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Izno, is there going to be an ArbCom statement regarding this block? signed, Rosguill talk 14:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
@Rosguill: I am not sure what you expect. ArbCom blocks are issued for privacy-related concerns, so it is generally inappropriate to announce to the public either that a) a user was blocked or b) why they were blocked. Izno (talk) 16:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Izno that in itself is sufficient clarification for me, it wasn't clear to me that the underlying reason was privacy-related. signed, Rosguill talk 16:18, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kevo327/Archive_2&oldid=1210917601"