User talk:Khalidnawaz123

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Newobserver. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for reminding me i am sorry and i have corrected my mistake .

Hi, I think, it would be better to find a response by Ahmadis, prefrebly from Alislam.org (Ahmadi official), than blanking. Thanks.Peaceworld111 (talk) 12:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I considered this allegation inappropriate to be put on wiki. thats why put it blank. however, i did know the hadith and gave the reference to this man . a question , Are you an ahmadi ?

Thanks for your kind question, but for now I would rather remain anonymous and not mention (simply because this is wikipedia) Whether I am an ahmadi or not should not affect the neutrality of the articles. I always try to remain neutral. Back to the crticism: I was wondering if you could find a good reference, that'll be great help. Thanks once again. Peaceworld111 (talk) 12:32, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well i find i can help make this page better by giving some unmentioned facts , and shall keep posting good references .--Khalidnawaz123 (talk) 08:56, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Minima c (talk) 10:21, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

i have invited newobserver for dispute resolution Khalidnawaz123 (talk)

Discussion[edit]

Please give thoughts here. --Peace world 20:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]