User talk:Kimberllymmpr

Kimberllymmpr, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Kimberllymmpr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet[edit]

I predict he might be another sockpuppet, since I have mentioned before, that his edits are similar to other edits. We are the Great (talk) 21:22, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Kimberllymmpr, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ravensfire (talk) 04:14, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started

Finding your way around

Editing articles

Getting help

Frequently asked questions
Cheatsheet
Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
Help pages
Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles

How you can help

Community Portal
Join a WikiProject
Follow Wikipedia etiquette
Practice civility
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

July 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of programs broadcast by Colors TV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The source needs to explicitly support that the show will be broadcast on that channel. A tweet from a person with two show title names is NOT a reliable source for an upcoming broadcast. Please don't add it back with teh same source. Ravensfire (talk) 04:15, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of programs broadcast by Colors TV, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Again, the source must be explicit and not about a hypothetical or "interest" if a second season happens. That pinkvilla source is NOT a good source for an upcoming show. Please don't use it again. Please discuss this on the article talk page before making further edits, you are at the WP:3RR limit around reverts. Ravensfire (talk) 13:25, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have given many sources which states madhubala 2 can come but you edit, liable or not even producer said they want to bring back the show, producer words, articles and hope is the only explicit source i have, plz let me only one show our hopes our favourite couple comeback don't remove it Kimberllymmpr (talk) 19:14, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But i included the citation and if the show comes explicitly will broadcast on viacom18 network is my hope iwm is most trusted and best site even it shows desire of show coming back Kimberllymmpr (talk) 17:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it does NOT say the show is coming back, only that there are talks. The source MUST be definite about this. You need to STOP adding this to the article. This is a final warning, if you add it back again without a better source (and I checked, there isn't one), I will ask you to be blocked from editing the article due to edit-warring. There is a talk page discussion where you are welcome to post sources, but nothing you've given so far works. I get you are a fan and want the show to come back - that's what Facebook, twitter, forums and blogs are for. Don't use Wikipedia for that, it will get you blocked from editing. Ravensfire (talk) 17:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-war warning[edit]

Your recent editing history at List of programs broadcast by Colors TV shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
You need to stop reverting and discuss this on the article talk page. You are using a sources that does NOT definitively state the show will be broadcast, that's not enough for inclusion in this article. You will end up blocked if you continue to push this material when multiple editors have reverted you. Ravensfire (talk) 13:31, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a talk page discussion - Talk:List_of_programs_broadcast_by_Colors_TV. Please do NOT restore your edit until there is a consensus to include in that discussion. Ravensfire (talk) 13:40, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jugjugg Jeeyo, you may be blocked from editing. Grabup (talk) 13:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022[edit]

Your recent editing history at Jugjugg Jeeyo shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Storchy (talk) 15:16, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But whatever i wrote is true its budget is 100 crore and other articles also shown it and Sacnilk is most trusted site, so its not edit war, just true fact so plz let it remain 100 crores Kimberllymmpr (talk) 04:57, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kimberllymmpr, Sacnilk is a blog site which is not a reliable source as per WP:ICTFSOURCES. You shouldn't cite Sacnilk as a source for Film Budgets and Box Office collections. You shouldn't revert anyone's edit if anyone revert your edit with a proper reason and if you think that the person who reverted your edit is wrong then you should start a discussion at his talk page or at the article's talk page instead of starting an edit war. Grabup (talk) 08:00, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]