User talk:KingDrewpert

May 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Vancouver, Washington has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Vancouver, Washington was changed by KingDrewpert (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.870293 on 2016-05-04T05:11:50+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Vancouver, Washington with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DrBungle (talk) 05:13, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Vancouver, Washington shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. BilCat (talk) 16:57, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. BilCat (talk) 17:26, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Amanda Cook (singer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Hello Walter, I am SO sorry. I was in no way trying to violate rules of any kind. Could you point me to the solution I'm looking for? Amanda Cook is no longer married or in relationship with her former Husband Jacob Cook. This is a personal and private detail of Amanda's life and I hope to add accuracy to Wikipedia without violating it's terms of use in any way.Drew Small(talk) 11:56, 5 March 2019 (CST) KingDrewpert (talk) 17:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]