User talk:Kingofallclergy

This is Kingofallclergy's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Kingofallclergy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

August 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Manifest Destiny. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 02:41, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

People that come here to read this do not know that democrats were [1850s] philosophically different then than they are today [2011]. A well read history expert will know this. History experts rarely need to read the definition of Manifest Destiny again and will only use this link for teaching. The word Democrat was used 6 times in the first paragraph. I removed 2 Kingofallclergy (talk) 23:43, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

alter-globalization[edit]

I'm very interested in keeping this topic alive and well defined. I use Wiki links much on my work on the web in social networking. People need to respect truths that are proven and the wiki-links are of great value. Kingofallclergy (talk) 09:25, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

aerocracy[edit]

aerocracy - Pronounced~[ a'-Row-kra'-see ]; 1. To rule by air power. Aerocracy (noun) >>> A nation or a country that rules by use of aviation technology. 2. A nation or country that uses aviation for supremacy and support of legal territories. The United States is the first Aerocracy in human history. Not unlike Britain[a Thalassocracy, a nation that ruled by sea.] In Greek/Latin the words and the derivatives make up the name- It looks like this;{[ ἀέριος aerios ἀέρι- aeri- of the air aerial, aerie, &, ἀερόβιος aerobios ἀερόβι- aerobi- living in air aerobic, aerobics, aerobiology, anaerobic, &, ἀήρ aēr ἀέρο- aero- air- air aerodynamics, aerofoil, aeronautics, aerobatics, airplane, airship. In the MODERN: αέρας, ύφος aeras, yfos ANCIENT: αήρ ο].[ κράτος kratos κρατ- krat- power, rule autocrat, democracy, bureaucracy]. One example is the Berlin airlift -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berlin_Blockade.

Unfortunately, Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a blog or social networking page, and is not for something you have made up or original research. Your recent article did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:43, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just stating the Wikipedia rules, Jimfbleak - talk to me? 17:21, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Areocracy[edit]

The article Areocracy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTNEO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Thebestofall007 (talk) 06:56, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthropological_criminology[edit]

I don't see/feel/define this wording as being a narrow heading, yet the main thrust of the writing as description w/ 2 biblos is concerning race and references to pseudo-sciences. In my mind I'm putting together of a picture where a resident anthropologists in police HQ monitors call severity and weighs the reactions o the force[individual officers stresses]-sometimes it's good to know when to take a break from the grind!-summary- I don't think the writing on this has been broad enough to describe the topic. In the mean time please check the references and proof it for overt-biasKingofallclergy (talk) 22:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (September 5)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Kingofallclergy/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kingofallclergy, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Kingofallclergy/sandbox[edit]

Hello, Kingofallclergy. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:18, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]