User talk:KlausSmithHeissler

Welcome![edit]

Hello, KlausSmithHeissler, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Boson (talk) 14:55, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Herbert[edit]

Categorising a fictional paedophile as LGBT is a controversial move, and something that is not supported by the article or the category. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 14:36, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Deaths from suicide has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Deaths from suicide, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Stevie is the man! ^{Talk • Work} 17:50, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Klaus Heissler, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Steve Smith and Hayley Smith. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wendy Testaburger, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Musical, John Hughes and The Spirit of Christmas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Humble (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bad Blood (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm GorillaWarfare. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sandy Cheeks— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:17, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop redirecting well-established articles of fictional characters. Such large redirects must be discussed ahead of time. GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I told you, go slow. You do not have enough experience to know what will fly and what won't, nor do I believe you have the judgment to be able to decide what is notable by our standards and what isn't. I appreciate your zeal, but biting off more than you can chew is not productive. Also, when GorillaWarfare speaks, it's a good idea to listen. Happy editing, Drmies (talk) 01:21, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to McGriddles. Prinsipe Ybarro (Talk to me) 01:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That edit was not vandalism. KlausSmithHeissler (talk) 01:38, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You replaced the entire contents of McGriddles with Barack Obama... How was that not vandalism? GorillaWarfare (talk) 01:39, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it was. I told you it's a good idea to pay attention when GorillaWarfare is speaking. Drmies (talk) 01:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't tell me what to do. You're not my mom or dad. KlausSmithHeissler (talk) 01:45, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Your mom and your dad don't have the power to block someone on this website; I do. If you hadn't left that tirritating response to GorillaWarfare's comment, and if you hadn't done it again, I wouldn't have blocked you. Drmies (talk) 01:52, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- So you were just another vandal. I'm sorry I took you seriously. Drmies (talk) 04:37, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Drmies (talk) 04:32, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I banned indefinitely? I'm not a sockpuppet. KlausSmithHeissler (talk) 11:50, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KlausSmithHeissler (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm really sorry for being an inconsiderate jerk, vandalizing pages, and redirecting them. I promise to never do anything consisting of that nature ever again. That said, can I please be granted another chance?

Decline reason:

To have any prospect of ever being unblocked you need to address the checkuser judgement that you are a sock of User:StewieRox. Because we have checkuser evidence a simple denial butters no parsnips; you need to present clear, countermanding evidence. Just Chilling (talk) 19:12, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Even if my edit are suspiciously similar to StewieRox's, I can gaurantee that I have no affiliation with this Wikipedia user. Check our IP addresses; we don't share the same IPs. KlausSmithHeissler (talk) 23:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you have no connection with StewieRox how do you know what IP address they use? Just Chilling (talk) 21:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I never said I know their IP address. I was just saying that I can gaurantee that we don't share the same IP address. That said, can you please unblock me? I will keep my promise of remaining constructive. KlausSmithHeissler (talk) 01:49, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Revived fictional characters has been nominated for discussion[edit]

Category:Revived fictional characters, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 17:03, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]