User talk:Kornography

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wassup people! Its Kornography!

I'm 19 years old...yeah...that's all I have to say

User Page Creation[edit]

Hey man, I know I don't know you, but I read your comment above and created a very basic user page for you. You can put anything you want into it, I just got you started. If you need any ideas on what you can do with this, just go to my userpage and see all that I put. I hope that my action tonight will make your Wikipedia experience even better. If you want to get to know the Wikipedian me, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. BTW nice choice in bands with Korn, but I must admit that I prefer their older material to the newer stuff, though Untitled is definetely better than See You on the Other Side. Dark Executioner (talk) 03:48, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner[reply]

Pimpin Your Page and Editing Wikipedia[edit]

You can make your own userboxes for your favorite bands by using this

band-3This user likes put band here.

. Put the band's name where it tells you. for example,

band-3This user likes Slayer.

Also, go to User:UBX and look for any that you like.

Most people don't know how to edit Wikipedia w/o getting bitched at by some administrator. But I'm going to tell you how to get around that. If you want to put some info that isn't on a page already, then make sure that you put the source from where you originally got the info from. To do that, just type [1] (click "EDIT" on your talk page to see what I'm talking about. And, if you leave a message on any Wiki talk page, make sure to sign your comments by typing four of these symbols ~ followed by your username. Both the reference tags and the signing function can be found in you Wiki toolbox below the "SAVE PAGE" function. I hope that this clears up any editing questions.
Thanks for getting back in contact w/ me. If you have any more questions, feel free to ask.

Dark Executioner (talk) 22:33, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Dark Executioner[reply]

Notability of Dear Future[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dear Future requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bagheera (talk) 22:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for the message on my talk page. The article about Dear Future was deleted under Speedy Celetion criterion A7; that is the article did not indicate why the band is important or significant. It has nothing to do with what I find interesting. Your argument that every band is significant is not a view accepted by the Wikipedia community. Please see Wikipedia's notability guidelines for musical groups for more information. I hope this reply is enough of a descriptive explanation; if not please let me know. -- Mattinbgn\talk 19:55, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube[edit]

Thanks for adding to the YouTube article with details of a particular spammer. I note also your edit summary asking for time to find the reference to show his/her notability.

The best place to put this information is probably at List of YouTube celebrities, rather than the main YouTube article which doesn't generally have space for the names and details of individual users. Once you have found the link to the video you mentioned, post the material at the "list of" page and add the link as a reference. If the video is published by a reliable, independent source then this should be enough to presrve this material from deletion. Euryalus (talk) 19:31, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Korn[edit]

No problem! Thanks. Be sure to keep in touch if you need help on anything. Burningclean [speak] 02:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox[edit]

No problem. I just copied the box on my page. Go to "edit" on your talk page, so that you can copy this and put it on your userpage.

Kornography
Birth nameInter birth name here if you want
Also known asGot any nicknames?
OriginWhere you live
GenresPut what kind of music you enjoy here
Occupation(s)Put your job here if you have one
Years activeHow long have you been alive?

Dark Executioner (talk) 17:53, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy birthday to me![edit]

Im 17 now! Woo!

Re: josh freese image 'vandalism'[edit]

hi , the image you undid, on josh freese's page is infact mr. freese, i am his web master and he gave the image to me to upload on here. please feel free to email for further info, thanks Trainer113 (talk) 13:28, 30 July 2008 (UTC) trainer113,[reply]

Diamond Eyes[edit]

Did Diamond Eyes leak due to an e-mail interception during pre-production or mixing stages? Perhaps the mastering stage? Are they post-production demos? Are they from an advanced copy of the album given to a Reprise Records employee? Each of these variations may contain tracks of different lengths that may or may not represent the final versions. As an experienced Wikipedia editor that frequently contributes to upcoming album articles, I can tell you first hand that leaked albums occasionally differ from the final product by several minutes. It is incorrect to add track lengths from anything but the final product. Posting track lengths from a leak also goes against several core Wikipedia guidelines and policies including: verifiability, no original research and reliable sources. Wait until either Billboard, Allmusic, or even Amazon and iTunes (all sources that get their information directly from the final product) post the track listings. Thank you. Fezmar9 (talk) 17:19, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, according to this blog it is very unlikely that the leak is the final recordings. Fezmar9 (talk) 18:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ type reference here