User talk:Ksense

I rectify the misquotations ('half' lies) & non referenced material ('full' lies) of those bent upon misleading wikipedians for sake of their own unstated obvious personal agenda..Ksense (talk) 10:29, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Your edit

Can you please explain this edit? The article needs to present the issue in neutral point-of-view and so the sections for each state. You just removed both the sections. If the issue is with wording, we could change the wording on the "Karnataka section" to be "Karnataka Government is opposed to the project on the grounds...". How does that sound? Regards, Ganeshk (talk) 11:43, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

reason for removing karnataka perspective is that it does not represent the govt/ people/ fact. reference your quoted reference tamil nadu perspective is trying to portray a non "karnataka bjp position" as belonging to only tamilnadu..there are many kannadigas who sympathise for the poor 'slow fluoride poisoning area', drought prone people's necessity to safe drinking water..we cant speculate perspective of a state/ write based on our "beliefs"...if someone has a census that "this"% of people in "this" state have "this" opinion & proves the neighbour has "opposite" opinion, such opinion can be posted..else state official govt. press releases only!!Ksense (talk) 12:48, 8 April 2008 (UTC)