User talk:Lana malih

March 2022[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kaftan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 01:09, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Kaftan, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 01:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The other thing worth mentioning here is that the image you are adding is a worthless 20th depiction of a historical figure that doesn't even mention the Kaftan. M.Bitton (talk) 01:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kaftan. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. M.Bitton (talk) 01:27, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you keep removing sourced content without a valid reason. As for you addition: unlike students, historians do not submit a thesis. I strongly suggest you stop edit warring and check the various discussions on the article's talk page. M.Bitton (talk) 01:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Kaftan. M.Bitton (talk) 01:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —C.Fred (talk) 01:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Sl99dl per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sl99dl. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- RoySmith (talk) 22:09, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]