User talk:Levivich

Hatting?

Hey. I just finished reading your main reply on the recall Phase 2 for why discussions on recall petitions is a positive. I get the idea, even though I still disagree. I agree with a space for editors to discuss "poor behaviour that does not violate policy" but my experience with the actual ways feedback happens involves a lot of back-and-forth bickering. So I still think it might be too rough if full discussion happens on recall petitions without exercising some sort of control to make it... not a second RFA (or third, since RRFA exists).

That said, it's a bit odd to see that massive wall of text in the middle of all other discussions before and after. Could I maybe convince you to summarise the main arguments a bit and hat the rest of them? It'd allow everyone to read the full text if they want, but also would make scrolling easier. Cheers! Soni (talk) 02:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Yeah that's a good idea, done. Levivich (talk) 02:50, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks! Soni (talk) 02:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)