User talk:Lillessrune

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


October 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Disenchantment (TV series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:12, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lillessrune, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Lillessrune! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 23 October 2020 (UTC)


October 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Disenchantment (TV series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Disenchantment (TV series) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:58, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Disenchantment (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. -- /Alex/21 21:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Disenchantment (TV series) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- /Alex/21 00:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion that you have thus far refused to contribute to. Continue to remove the content and not discuss, and you will be reported to the administration board for edit-warring. -- /Alex/21 00:11, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You have likely violated Wikipedia policies, and may face a report and be blocked for edit-warring and violating sourcing and original research policies. -- /Alex/21 22:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]