User talk:Lizardfish

Tokyo Two

I moved some of your stuff about Greenpeace to the bottom of the Tokyo Two article, and deleted some of it. You aren't supposed to use a party to a dispute as a source, but should use other sources, like news media and other uninvolved parties. I explained a little on the article discussion page. If you think I'm wrong, you can discuss it there. I tried adding an external link to the Greenpeace Sato and Suzuki page earlier, but the other editors deleted it. They will probably delete your link too. If you can find a news story with their photos, use that instead. Ghostofnemo (talk) 17:48, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

No worries. I'm learning what's acceptable and what's not. But would really like to use the official Greenpeace dossier as a reference for some of these facts. If you have any idea how we can get that in there. I tried but it got removed already. Was that you? Lizardfish (talk) 17:56, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Got Sato and Suzuki's page in as an external link (as an official page per WP:ELNO (first line)) and added a link to the Greenpeace page in the "See also" section (since the ICR article was listed). Don't see how you can use Greenpeace as a source though, due to policy cited on my talk page. Ghostofnemo (talk) 18:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

Here it is: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources Ghostofnemo (talk) 19:04, 25 June 2010 (UTC)