User talk:Lošmi

Grand Royal Coat of Arms of France & Navarre

Hi Lošmi, I've fixed the mistake now, Thanks for pointing it out! Sodacan (talk) 20:08, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Hello.

Hi, Miloše! :) Tell me, are you admin on sr wiki? All best! --Tadija^speaks 17:55, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, i was reorganising this

Wikipedia:WikiProject Serbia/Participants

So, as i remember from some photos, you were in the Dom Omladine on wiki meetings, so somewhere in my mind i thought that you were an admin. It was easiest to ask you, them search... :) Thanks anyway! You are cool! What do you think about new list? All best! --Tadija^speaks 21:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Činč

Morao sam da načinim neke male izmene u članku o grupi Činč. Uradio sam to iz najbolje namere, i doterao sam članak po uobičajenim standardima koji važe za članke o bendovima. Javljam ti ovo zato što postoji velika šansa da vratiš članak u prethodno stanje (što obićno rade oni koji naprave članak o nekom bendu da bi ga malo reklamirali), ali imaj u vidu da članak mora ozbiljno delovati da bi ga neko ozbiljno shvatio. Ostalocutanje (talk) 19:19, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

Ja se bavim uglavnom člancima o srpskim i (u nešto manjoj meri) jugoslovenskim rock bendovima i izvođačima. Čini mi se da je članak o Činču tvoj jedini doprinos u ovoj oblasti (izvini ako grešim). Zato sam pretpostavio da si jedan od mnogih koji se prijave samo da bi napravili članak o nekom bendu (neretko su to i sami članovi benda, što je po meni baš jadno), a taj bend članak najčešće ne zaslužuje. Sa takvim korisnicima često ratujemo - čini mi se da ih ima dosta na srpskoj Vikipediji? Ja smatram da imenima kao što su Duh Nibor, Krivokletnik, Skepsa i još nekolicini ne treba da ima mesta na Vikipediji pa ni na srpskoj. Ako tamo dopuštate nekome da se reklamira, mi se ovde trudimo da to ne činimo. Po mom skromnom mišljenju, i mišljenju još jednog korisnika koji se bavi člancima o srpskoj rock sceni, bend Činč članak još uvek (naglašam ovo još uvek) ne zaslužuje, ali nismo ni mi sveznajući kada je o srpskoj muzičkoj sceni reč, vrlo je moguće da grešimo. E sad, što se tiče "ozbiljnosti" ona se odnosi pre svega na vizuelnu stranu članka, na sitnice koje njegov izgled usklađuju sa izgledom članaka o muzičkim grupama. To je ono što sam uradio. Uklonio sam veze za članove benda jer mislim da je teško da će ikada dobiti svoje članke. Uklonio sam i imena nepostojećih muzičkih žanrova. Svestan sam želje članova Činča da izmisle poneki novi žanr, ili budu predstavnici nekog skoro izmišljenog žanra, ali bih pričekao pre nego što ih okarakatreišem...ne sećam se više ni ja kako, uglavnom, pričekao bih barem dok ti žanrovi ne dobiju članak na Wikipedii. Ono "zbirka pop i rok pesama" sam izbrisao jer nisam znao da je deo zvaničnog imena albuma. A jedina rečenica koju sam uklonio iz samog teksta je ona koja kaže da u njihove melodije kompleksne, a tekstovi (čini mi se da je pisalo) duhoviti. Članak nije kritika. Ostalocutanje (talk) 18:32, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Nisam rekao da si član benda, niti da ja i još jedan uređivač, ne daj Bože, imamo monopol na članke o srpskim bendovima. Uostalom, članak je tu, zar ne? Možda bi i u članku i moglo da se nađe da imaju neobične tekstove, ali mislim da izbor reči treba da odgovara enciklopeiji. Ostalocutanje (talk) 19:03, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Problem je u sva tri prideva. Možda je reč unusual bolja od weird i peculiar? Ali ko osim kritičara može reći da su melodije "sofisticirane"? A što se tiče rečenice iz članka o Motorheadu, sigurno je da nije enciklpoedijska. Jedino što me sprečava da odem i promenim je to što smatram da će neko od stotina korsinika koje rad na tom članku zanima to već srediti... Ostalocutanje (talk) 20:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Ako ti ta recenica toliko znaci, vrati je... Ostalocutanje (talk) 13:43, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Usagi Yojimbo Characters

Template:Usagi Yojimbo Characters has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Ratko Mladić - Serbian script

Hello. There is a small problem with this arrangement when we apply Serbian Cyrillic for Cyrillic-only requirements. As multi-script languages are relatively rare, the default system here is designed to take Serbian for its Cyrillic form only, most likely based on its status in Serbia's constitution which gives it rank over Latinic. This is why any text inserted into {lang-hr} will be in italics (Roman script) but in normal form for {lang-sr}. When subjects are given in English as in their Serbian Latinic (transliterated) form, it requires only a Cyrillic presentation, as with Mladić. When you have something needing a full translation (e.g. Belgrade), we then need /Београд, Beograd/. The trouble with {lang-sr} is that it doesn't accommodate this need and we are forced to compensate manually (eg. {lang-sr|Београд}, 'Beograd'), etc. One way or another, we can never use the {lang-sr} facility without one problem. Because of this, I believe it is fine to use Cyrillic only, it is more or less clear from the article name that the name is based on Serbian in the first place. Evlekis (Евлекис) 12:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

You're right about the constitution and about the widespread usage. Don't get me wrong, your edit was correct and I don't contest it. I'm just saying that {lang-sr} is set up for Cyrillic only. If you put Roman letters in, it won't italise. Evlekis (Евлекис) 12:21, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Serbian salad-01.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Serbian salad-01.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fleet Command (talk) 17:44, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Serbian salad-01.jpg

Hello, Lošmi.

Unfortunately, I am unable to fulfill your rename request because the file is not located on Wikipedia; rather, it is located on Wikimedia Commons. To rename the file, please follow this link and file your rename request there:

commons:File:Serbian_salad-01.jpg

Regards, Fleet Command (talk) 17:47, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Politikin Zabavnik 73.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Politikin Zabavnik 73.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zabavnik latinica.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zabavnik latinica.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:31, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

An invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska

WikiProject Republika Srpska
Project Icon Hi, Lošmi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the WikiProject Republika Srpska! WikiProject Republika Srpska is a WikiProject whose aim is to improve the quality and coverage of articles related to Republika Srpska and the Serbs of Bosnia and Herzegovina. It is chiefly designed to help users collaborate on articles, but also to resolve open questions and disputes, to establish project-wide conventions, and to coordinate work on vandalism clean-up. WikiProject Republika Srpska currently covers a total of 0 articles and 0 other related pages on the English Wikipedia.
We look forward to welcoming you to the project!

--Anulmanul (talk) 21:49, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Quixotic plea

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 06:38, 23 May 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:B92 Cube Logo, 2012.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:B92 Cube Logo, 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 10 July 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Lošmi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Potpis tadic.gif listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Potpis tadic.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Soyuz TMA-13

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Soyuz TMA-13 Edit.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Armbrust The Homunculus 10:11, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Potpis tadic.svg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Potpis tadic.svg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:03, 24 November 2022 (UTC)