User talk:Lo que pasa

Welcome, and invitation[edit]

WikiProject Objectivism
Salutations, Lo que pasa. I've noticed you identify as an Objectivist Wikipedian and would like to invite you to join the freshly resuscitated WikiProject Objectivism, a group of Wikipedians devoted to improving articles related to Objectivism. If you're interested, consider adding yourself to the list of participants and joining the discussion on the talkpage.

Yours in enlightened self-interest, Skomorokh 00:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shortcuts

You are cordially invited to save the world[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Capitalism Byelf2007 (talk) 15 September 2011

February 2012[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 17:22, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. whatever you want to call it, whether SYNTH or OR or whatever: you're making stuff up. Don't. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 19:32, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You need third party reliable sources for your edit, at the moment you only have a primary source. Your last sentence is original research. The edit has therefore been reverted per WP:BRD. Please take the matter to talk. Continuing to engage in edit warring will get you nowhere and may result in a block. ISTB351 (talk) 00:05, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 01:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Materialscientist (talk) 01:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]