User talk:LonesomeDrifter

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.


Welcome![edit]

Hello, LonesomeDrifter, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; I hope you like the place and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Though we all make goofy mistakes, here is what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

Now, the above was a template, and I myself know (from experience) that nothing gets the job done better than a real human, so feel free to drop me a line right there :) I hope you have fun on Wikipedia! --MasTer of Puppets 02:28, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the warm welcome, and the warm template :p Seriously, though, thanks, and I appreciate having all those links in one nice accesible place (i.e here). --Kevin L. 04:47, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Images on user page[edit]

Hi. I removed the images from userpage because they did were copyright violations, per our fair use criteria. Thanks.--Sean Black (talk) 00:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Raymond Carver / phenomenology / inquiry[edit]

To Whom It May Be of Interest to Kindly Reply -

I am a student in the mid-west. Recently I was introduced to the short fiction of Raymond Carver (1938-1988), specifically the collection What We Talk About When We Talk About Love (knopf 81'). If you are familiar with his work you may know that it is spare in manner, and has been compared to that of Kafka or Pinter.

Concurrent to this I have been reading about Husserl and phenomenology.

The idea of understanding/interpreting Carvers' character sketches from an phenomenological perspective fascinates me. But as I am a rank amature with philosophy, perhaps I am projecting too much and the comparison is unlikely. I can find no commentary on this idea. I would appreciate any reply at:

                              teddisonsmith@insightbb.com
                                                                 2-06-07
I am very sorry, but I am not acquainted with the work of Raymond Carver. I will be sure to look into him. Drifter 15:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Drift - Thanks. If you should find the time for that, perhaps you would shoot me a few lines on this. teddisonsmith@insightbb.com

AfD nomination of Gestell[edit]

I have nominated Gestell, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gestell. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice?  Sandstein  16:50, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]