User talk:Longlivefolkmusic

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Longlivefolkmusic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Infrogmation 03:41, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greenpoint[edit]

I've restored your edit of working class on the Greenpoint entry along with information. Please elaborate on this data if you can.--Paraphelion 19:03, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey no problem, that other dude was kind of psycho. I have friends in Greenpoint that probably would be considered part of this "gentrification", and several of them are poor artists, though poor mostly by choice, so I'm not convinced even the gentrification is adding significantly to the median income, yet.--Paraphelion 05:31, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Polish Wiktionary[edit]

I invite you to Polish Wiktionary because you know a lot of language (also Polish)./Zapraszam Cię do polskiego wikisłownika, bo widzę, że znasz kilka języków (w tym także polski). Mógłbyś się nam przydać np. jako ekspert od francuskiego. Pietras1988 TALK 16:29, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Boris Johnson[edit]

From what I read in the discussion pages, there wasn't a majority. Put it to a vote there if you think there is.(Halbared 18:22, 4 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Lubinskas[edit]

Could you see my question at Talk:Chronicles (magazine)? Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 19:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Labour Party (UK)[edit]

Thanks for correcting the Labour Party (UK) article regarding their last election victory prior to 1997. I had mentioned this in the Talk page but wasn't sure if anybody had taken any notice.

Chamberlain[edit]

Chamberlain would have been a member of the Birmingham Liberal Unionist Association, which remained separate after the 1912 merger and only merged with the Birmingham Conservatives in 1918. Hence, Chamberlain was never a member of the Conservative Party, never referred to himself as a Conservative and it would be false to refer to him thus in the article. The article itself has already reached a sufficient size - I do not believe that it would be beneficial to expand it further, nor to contract it. Thanks.

InfectedWithRage

Accidently removing references[edit]

Hi, you recently shortened a section on the C. S. Lewis page dealing with criticism. However, you (I assume accidentally) also deleted the reference the rest of the paragraph was based on. I've reinserted it, so it's no big deal, but it's something you might like to watch out for in future. :) Cheers! Martin 14:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it at all; I just thought you might like to have it drawn to your attention. :)
On the subject of Lewis, I'm letting regular contributors to the C. S. Lewis article know that its good article nomination is on hold until more references are added to the article. We have two weeks to bring the article up to the required GA standards. If you can spare some time, it'd be great if you could add some references to the article, and hopefully improve its chances of becoming a Good Article. If you know of any other editors who would be interested in helping out, please let them know. Cheers, Martin 18:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conservative Party (UK)[edit]

Hi Longlivefolkmusic! Well done on your recent edit to the Conservative Party page, you really squashed some POV and readability issues.--Fergie 19:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Modern age.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Modern age.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:29, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rusty Hilger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marc Wilson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Katowice, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish communist party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poniatowski Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trolley. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Agnieszka Holland may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ]. She was told that she could not return to Poland, and was unable to see or even have any contact) with her daughter for over eight months.<ref name="Crnković 1999 pp. 2-9"/> ''Fever'' was entered

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:42, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

History of the Poles in the United States[edit]

Given your high fluency in Polish, I am reaching out to you in regards to the History of the Poles in the United States article. It has no Polish equivalent, and any time you can spend towards translating in any capacity would be much-appreciated. I would be more than happy to help any way that I can.

Thank you! Pola.mola (talk) 20:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Longlivefolkmusic. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Longlivefolkmusic. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]