User talk:LoveforMary

Hello, LoveforMary, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 22:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

January 2012[edit]

Hello LoveforMary and welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. Elizium23 (talk) 00:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am with a different group. We recently created Our Lady of Guidance, Our Lady of Rosary La Naval de Manila today and reworded the clumsy wording on Santo Nino de Cebu. We appreciate you correcting the dead link on the Immaculate Conception for Lutheran readers. LoveforMary (talk) 00:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)LoveforMary[reply]

You may want to explain that at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar. Please read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry#Meatpuppetry for an explanation of why we discourage groups of people from operating single-purpose accounts. Elizium23 (talk) 03:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am now reading the link to Puppetry which you attached in the last message. I do understand that several people cannot use a single account due to sockpuppet issues mentioned above. LoveforMary (talk) 03:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)LoveforMary[reply]

Ok, Elizium thinks we should provide the benefit of the doubt here & your tone is different now. But if you are to edit pages, please refrain from the LloydBaltazar approach of adding personally touched up images as art, repeated reverts, etc. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 06:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig pages[edit]

Well, you just turned Immaculate Conception (disambiguation)‎ into a mini-article! What can I say.... The problem with Lloydbaltazar type edits was 170% zeal, and a somewhat singular viewpoint. That problem still seems to persist... Please let that be a disambig page like all others, and somehow find a balance in your edits. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 19:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway, someone else reverted that. History2007 (talk) 22:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR and Afd[edit]

Nomination of Immaculate Conception of Saint John the Baptist for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Immaculate Conception of Saint John the Baptist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Immaculate Conception of Saint John the Baptist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. History2007 (talk) 07:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Our Lady of Guidance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chinese, Filipino, Ermita, Nipa, Apostolic, Battle of Manila and Marian

Santo Niño de Cebú (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Spanish, Filipino and King Charles III

Immaculate Conception of Saint John the Baptist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Orthodox and Saint Elizabeth

Our Lady of Rosary Naval de Manila (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Chinese and Filipino

Patrick Peyton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Irish and Filipino

Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Portuguese

Immaculate Conception (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Filipino

Our Lady of Guadalupe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Roses

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Coronation of the Virgin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gothic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Request of lift blockage[edit]

Hello, I am kindly requesting an administrator to lift the blockage currently placed on this IP address. There has recent been an abuse from another individual who has caused the wide block due to numerous edits, but that has been change into the group which now uses a separate account under LoveForMary. It is not handled by Baltazar but by Mauricio. Thank you, Mauricio.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

LoveforMary (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

98.148.213.201 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

[[WP:Block#Evasion of blocks|Block evasion]]: see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar]] - another 6 months

Blocking administrator: Joao (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Per the remark above by Mauricio, I am declining to unblock as this account is there stated to represent (or possibly be used by) a group. This is against Wikipedia policies. Peridon (talk) 10:43, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Kateri Tekakwitha has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. The painting of Kateri Tekakwitha which you uploaded and represented as your own work was not yours. The author has removed it from the article. Wikipedia takes copyright issues very seriously. Do not misrepresent copyrighted works again. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 05:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification[edit]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Our Lady of Peace and Good Voyage (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Filipino, Elementary and Quiapo

Our Lady of the Candles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Filipino, Apostolic and Jaro

Manila Cathedral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to German and Atonement

Jaro Cathedral (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jaro

Mother Angelica (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Apparition

National Shrine of Our Mother of Perpetual Help (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to COMELEC

Pedro Calungsod (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Migrant

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pope Benedict XVI, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. --some jerk on the Internet (talk) 21:37, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:35, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Elizium23 (talk) 04:00, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We are having problems with this account, as I mentioned on Talk:Patronages_of_the_Immaculate_Conception. The editor (or the multiple people using the account) do add some material that has value. But for the life of me, I can not get the idea of WP:RS across and get them to follow it. They add reasonably correct sentences 50% to 60% of the time, then diverge into WP:OR about "pious speculation" with no sources and then add websites that are miles from WP:RS. This account is running rampant in some sense and unless something is done will just reduce the quality of content by running over WP:RS again and again. History2007 (talk) 08:45, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Pope Joan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Elizium23 (talk) 20:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your current streak of disruptive editing, I have relisted you and recommended a block at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar. Have a nice day. Elizium23 (talk) 20:29, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I commented there that this group of people eat up time faster than Pac-Man and are turning Wikipedia into Inventopedia with new inventions of their own as they keep typing invented material into pages all over the place. History2007 (talk) 21:40, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please have some tea and calm down. The emotionality of your responses is excessive and uncivil. Mangoe (talk) 23:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You may need to make them a large pot of tea Mangoe, because there may be a few people using that account. And for the record, here is the relevant conversation and the WP:3RR line was crossed there, even after I mentioned it on talk. History2007 (talk) 23:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Lloydbaltazar (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 14:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nobel Prize in persistence[edit]

Is there a Nobel Prize in persistence? If so we should nominate this splendid group for it: please see Special:Contributions/38.121.23.173... Wikipedia may be entering a new phase where a group of determined users can over-run the system. History2007 (talk) 19:45, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

They are back![edit]

Please see User talk:Succursu, and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar same edits.... History2007 (talk) 20:46, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another possibility[edit]

I am not 100% sure about this yet, but another user also expressed a concern that this user may be a new puppet. Time will tell. History2007 (talk) 07:12, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is very likely that user:HeartyBowl1989 is a new puppet of this. I am about 90% sure now. History2007 (talk) 13:18, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You know the drill - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Lloydbaltazar Elizium23 (talk) 13:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe again: User:Tomlin87721, and again. History2007 (talk) 08:20, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]