User talk:Mango101

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mango101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in cycling-related themes, you may want to check out the Cycling Portal. If you are interested in contributing more to cycling related articles you may want to join WikiProject Cycling.

Again, welcome! Severo^TC 22:35, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Severo Mango101 15:16, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stubs[edit]

You are creating stubs after stubs without expanding them, that is not good. The stubs you are introducing will remain in its present version forever. Please expand the articles you are creating bye adding more information. Thanks.Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:36, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, Otolemur. I just don't know any more information. But by making these stubs, I invite others to expand these articles. Greets. Mango101 (talk) 22:09, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know it's much later, but I must agree with Mango here. To me it's much better to have at least some information on someone than not to have anything and leave someone searching for that person unhappy because he was unable to find anything. So, even if an article is never going to be expanded it's a good thing to create the stub. Iameddie (talk) 01:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cyclists[edit]

Hi, I just saw your message on my talk page and I would like to comment on you. The conversation of me and the other user has been continued at his talk page, so if you want to read that you can check it there. Your comment however was about unknown riders. At least one of the two you pointed out has won quite some races, so I don't really see why he should not be included? The other one, I can somehow understand as he did not win that much yet, but he still did win a professional race, which is making him notable enough to be in here, in my opinion. Iameddie (talk) 01:54, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but in here we include all ProTour-riders and other notable riders (in PCT & CT Teams). If we are going to include all riders who have won at least 1 professional race, this encyclopaedia would contain millions of unknown cyclists and that's not the purpose of this site, I think. Mango101 (talk) 17:55, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Etienne De Wilde[edit]

I saw your recent addition to the Etienne De Wilde article. It's good you added the teams and some victories that were not in the list yet! But I have some serious doubts about the notability of some other entries. Is it really notable that De Wilde finished 10th place in the 1989 Milan-Sanremo? Or that he was 125th in the 1991 Tour de France? For cyclists with only a small list of victories, other rankings can be notable enough to include, but De Wilde has victories enough. The page as it is now is an unattractive list of top10 finishes, with a small lead. Do you agree that De Wilde was successful enough so that not all his top10-standings need to be included? If so, I will remove them. --EdgeNavidad (talk) 11:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, maybe you're right. De Wilde does have an impressive amount of victories! But I still think his palmares should include his 4th place on the World Championship-Points Race (1991) or his 2nd place in Gent-Wevelgem (1987). Top 5 in an important race should always be mentioned, except in the palmaresses of Merckx, Anquetil and other legends, of course ;-). But, you're right, I will remove the less important entries. Mango101 (talk) 17:34, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Future Edits[edit]

Hello, Please can i ask that in the interest of courtesy and for ease of understanding when making edits like you have done to Fantasy Ride can you provide an WP:edit summary. this helps other editors identify what changes have been made to articles. I know myself that sometimes i forget to do so, but it does make things easier for other users if you can provide a brief summary of the additions/deletions or changes you have made to an article. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Mango101! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 18 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Jean Eudes Demaret - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Alexandre Blain - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Damien Gaudin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Andrey Zeits - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Roman Kireyev - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Sjef Janssen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Niels Scheuneman - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Maxime Monfort - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Florian Stalder - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Luis Pasamontes - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...
11. Thomas Fothen 12. Julio Alberto Pérez 13. Dionisio Galparsoro 14. Alexandre Usov 15. Aitor Hernández 16. Gabriele Balducci 17. Philipp Ludescher

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:55, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United Network (October 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:United Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 20:30, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mango101, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 20:30, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:United Network concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:United Network, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:United Network[edit]

Hello, Mango101. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "United Network".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 20:33, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to the African Destubathon[edit]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 10:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Mango101. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic Sports Project[edit]

Hello Mango!

I have seen you do lots of edits about Olympic sports here on Wiki. I am searching for a couple of people who would like to contribute on an external international website about Olympic sports, posting results of Olympic Sports on a regular basis. You could choose the sport(s) you want to contribute in and take care of that section. The aim of the website is to become the best source for sports results and to do that we need some more contributers across all sports.

No money involved, so just for passion, and of course no time obligations needed, just in your free time. Are you in? :)

Thank you in advance! RoadToTokyo2020 (talk) 06:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Mango101. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]