User talk:ManicParroT

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello ManicParroT, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the place and decide to stick around.

Here are some useful tips:

Flowerparty talk 01:24, 6 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Another South African![edit]

I've followed some of your recent edits and I love them! Why don't you tell us a bit about yourself on you user page? From you edits I'm assuming you're South African. It's at times like this when I stop feeling so pessimistic about Wikipedia's coverage of African topics. Zyxoas (talk to me - I'll listen) 18:51, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Alex-Badge1.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Alex-Badge1.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:48, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey![edit]

Well, seems I run into you all over the Internet. Welcome to Wikipedia. Some extra tips: For adding references to an article, the footnotes system is pretty handy. I like to also use various citation template to format the references nicely. For some examples, check out the Crimen injuria or Sharpeville Massacre articles. (You may want to add to those articles, if you feel bored.) Check out the links on the Sharpeville Massacre page to the TRC report: There's a wealth of information there for articles on Apartheid-era politics. -Kieran 18:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject South Africa invite[edit]

Thank you for your recent contributions to one or more of Wikipedia's South African related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining the South Africa WikiProject? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's South Africanrelated content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project's talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! --NJR_ZA (talk) 09:44, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Tom Eaton (author) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 12:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tom Eaton (author) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable author - clearly fails WP:AUTHOR, e.g. being "regarded as an important figure" or whose work "has won significant critical attention"

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 22:45, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Alexandra High School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable school. No citations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shantavira|feed me 13:22, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]