User talk:MattStan10

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, User:Katyperry, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. --NawlinWiki (talk) 22:18, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

MattStan10, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi MattStan10! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page List of most viewed YouTube videos has been reverted.
Your edit here to List of most viewed YouTube videos was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLirAqAtl_h2r5g8xGajEwdXd3x1sZh8hC) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:33, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:MattStan10

User:MattStan10, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MattStan10 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:MattStan10 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Ricky81682 (talk) 07:04, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

Access dates

Hi, I wanna know why you reverted the accessdates on List of most disliked YouTube videos. An access date is when the item was accessed thus if you're updating a list, wouldn't that need to be changed too? The editnotice says the opposite to what you put into the article. --Anarchyte (work | talk) 06:48, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

According to this Wikipedia Category, "The |access-date= (or its alias, |accessdate=) is the date that the online resource addressed by |url= was added to the article." Therefore the accessdates should not change because the online resources were only added to the article once. They are not added to the article every time the dislike count is updated. --MattStan10 (talk) 18:46, 14 May 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of most liked YouTube videos has been accepted

List of most liked YouTube videos, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

--Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:59, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

MOS:CT

Hi there, with regard to this edit at Masha and the Bear, please note that we do not capitalize the article "the" unless it comes at the beginning of a sentence. Our style manual entry for composition titles can be found at MOS:CT. Thanks. --Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

I figured the "the" needed to be capitalized due to the fact that their official logo, official website and official YouTube channel all have the word capitalized. I didn't realize there was a rule preventing me from correcting an obvious style error in a title. --MattStan10 (talk) 02:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)

List of Most Viewed YouTube Videos - Masha and the Bear

I said I understand if my edit was undid, but your reasoning is invalid. The episode name is "Recipe for Disaster". "Masha and the Bear" is the name of the series. --0737290632t2x273n (talk) 12:18, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

OH! I understand now. The video name you inserted was the russian name. I apoligize for that. --0737290632t2x273n (talk) 12:43, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Hey Matt

The song of Jacob Sartorius Hit or Miss is suppose tobe in the list of the most disliked videos on youtube with 542K dislikes. Thx to update it. --Erykamah (talk) 01:28, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Done Thank you for pointing that out. --MattStan10 (talk) 04:01, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Please

Please don't mark edits with over a 1,000 bytes minor, it really makes it confusing to other editors why you did this edit, and can get very annoying with you do this repeatedly. It really isn't this huge of a deal to me, but it can be to other editors. Just please don't mark large edits with a minor edit next time. --JJBers (talk) 00:03, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

I'm going to assume you're referring to my last edit on the list of the most subscribed users on YouTube. I marked the edit as minor because the appearance of the page changed very little between revisions. All I did was center the subscriber counts and link them to their YouTube channels. It took over 1,000 bytes because the links alone took up an average of 33 characters each (990 bytes in total). It really wasn't that big of an edit if you take a look at how little I changed. At least, I didn't think it was. --MattStan10 (talk) 04:38, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Ok, I can see that the appearance of the page didn't change much, but the source/internals of the page changed very much and can throw off editors occasionally, again it isn't much of a big deal to me, but some more dedicated authors it is. --JJBers (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Most liked videos

I misunderstood the table on the current and former records for List of most liked YouTube videos. I thought that "See You Again" being the current record holder, that it would also show on the table. What I didn't know was that the colors on the table was about the record on "Days held", rather than the actual record of likes. I apologize for the misunderstanding. --Sekyaw (talk) 14:52, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

@Sekyaw: No worries! I figured it was a misunderstanding --MattStan10 (talk) 04:34, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of most disliked YouTube videos. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Mlpearc (open channel) 01:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

@Jim1138: I never added any unsourced content. Can you please elaborate on what you think I did wrong? --MattStan10 (talk) 02:06, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

No idea. Nothing I would have reverted. But then, I am not familiar with the area. Mis-click possibly. @Mlpearc: A bit more explanation, if you please? Cheers --Jim1138 (talk) 08:12, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

My apologies, it does seem to be a mis-click. --Mlpearc (open channel) 13:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Advertising VEVO on "List of most liked YouTube videos"

Why is it important to advertise VEVO on this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TangLab (talk • contribs) 18:51, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, MattStan10. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

AFD Nomination

I have nominated the List of most discussed YouTube videos for deletion, as seen here. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 23:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of List of most viewed Bollywood videos on YouTube for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most viewed Bollywood videos on YouTube is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most viewed Bollywood videos on YouTube until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of List of fastest YouTube videos to reach 100 million views for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of fastest YouTube videos to reach 100 million views is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of fastest YouTube videos to reach 100 million views until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

A barnstar for you!

	The Resilient Barnstar
	Fantastic contributions, very dedicated. Jackalexander102 (talk) 04:17, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Revert on List of most disliked YouTube videos

Sorry I didn't write a proper edit summary (I pressed the wrong Twinkle button), but I reverted your edit because align=center is an obsolete attribute in HTML5 and is supposed to be replaced by CSS. Jc86035 (talk) Use {{re|Jc86035}}
to reply to me 16:07, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

@Jc86035: Ohhh I understand now. I didn't know that. Thanks for the explanation! --MattStan10 (talk) 18:40, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Rassilon

Hi User:MattStan10, can you make an image map of all the regenerations of Rassilon for the article's infobox please? Like the one on The Master (Doctor Who).--Theo Mandela (talk) 03:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Reason for removing the videos on "List of most viewed online videos in the first 24 hours"

I initially removed the videos on the article, List of most viewed online videos in the first 24 hours, because they were poorly sourced, per WP:OR. For example, all the videos for the "YouTube Rewinds" are sourced to either this playlist by "MyTop100" videos, https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLirAqAtl_h2paOfFiwY-I62jFk2n07ayI. The playlist in question had things like "witnessed" and "stats", and hasn't been updated since December 2016. Furthermore, the "Adele Carpool Karaoke" video was sourced to the stats of the YouTube video itself. I honestly tried to look up news-sources for the 24-hour-ranking for these viral videos, but couldn't find them. It is safer to neglect these videos than to include every single alleged video. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 03:09, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

@Yoshiman6464: I agree. A playlist with annotations is not a reliable source so I tried to find better sources to cite the videos. I couldn't find any for "Bait Boy", "Lasso for Cop Cars", "Rewind YouTube Style 2012", "Adele Carpool Karaoke", or "Meteorite Crash in Russia" so I didn't add them back. But I did re-add "YouTube Rewind 2016", "YouTube Rewind 2015", "YouTube Rewind 2014", "Booty", "Mi Gente", and "As If It's Your Last" because I found sources that prove each of those videos belong on the list. --MattStan10 (talk) 05:22, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

@MattStan10: I looked at the sources you've added.

YT Rewind 2016 - MyTop100Videos (Not Reliable; Original Research)

YT Rewind 2015 - Archived YouTube Video (Original Research)

YT Rewind 2014 - Archived YouTube Video (Original Research)

Booty - Kworb.net (Original Research, not a News Site but a Stats Site)

Mi Gente - Kworb.net (Original Research, not a News Site but a Stats Site)

As If It's Your Last - News Article from Soompi - Acceptable for Wikipedia

Out of all the sources that you've added, only The K-Pop song is appropriate for Wikipedia. So I removed all the added songs except for "As If It's Your Last". Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 13:23, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

@Yoshiman6464: The Wayback Machine is a reliable source used on many YouTube related lists as a reference, Kworb.net is a reliable third party source, and I found a different source for the YT Rewind 2016 video. We shouldn't exclude videos that we KNOW meet the criteria for the list just because a news source didn't cover it. That doesn't make their accomplishments any less true. There IS proof that the videos in question did reach those numbers in 24 hours. --MattStan10 (talk) 15:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

@MattStan10: I understand that there is "proof" for these videos reaching 24 hours, but the wikipage says that the list is "incomplete" and that it is "frequently updated to include new information." Also, how do you know that the Wayback Machine is exactly 24 hours? Even if that were the case, it would still violate WP:OR. The same applies with Kworb.net. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 17:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

I also forgot to mention that on other YouTube-related lists, such as List of most liked YouTube videos, the Wayback Machine archives of YouTube videos are mostly paired with reliable sources. However, on List of most viewed YouTube videos, most of the segments requiring the use of the Wayback Machine include sections of original research (listing the Xth video to reach 1 billion views and Most viewed "By year of release"), which I will mention on that site's talk page. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 17:19, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

most liked tweets and retweets

Where do you find all these old tweets?? Gang14 (talk) 16:34, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

@Gang14: I find them here and here on Favstar. --MattStan10 (talk) 20:00, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:See You Again performed by Wiz Khalifa.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:See You Again performed by Wiz Khalifa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, MattStan10. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of most streamed songs on Spotify, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of most-liked tweets for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-liked tweets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-liked tweets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — JFG ^talk 16:44, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, MattStan10. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of most-followed Twitter accounts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-followed Twitter accounts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-followed Twitter accounts (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:33, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of List of most-liked YouTube videos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of most-liked YouTube videos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of most-liked YouTube videos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2019 (UTC)