User talk:McNulTEA
Hello, McNulTEA, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out [[ the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 07:56, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
Welcome![edit]
Welcome and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! They are much appreciated. I'd also invite you to edit you very own user page, User:McNulTEA, to tell us more about yourself! Thanks again for your hard work here! 01:04, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
July 2020[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 16:20, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
The Mother Jones article mentions all those names in support of Pinker mentioned in the article and is not a user-generated content. That is an independent secondary source. You can't unilaterally delete paragraphs on a whim. If you still have concerns, raise the issue in talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.238.105.198 (talk) 22:31, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Robert Trivers, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Crossroads -talk- 16:11, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Crossroads -talk- 18:06, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 22:34, 15 July 2020 (UTC) Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Pinker. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. WikiMacaroonsCinnamon? 17:23, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
Steven Pinker[edit]
Pinker's critics are the one who have signed the letter. Their opinions are included in that letter itself and their accusation is included in the paragraph. Pinker's supporters are included only to counterbalance the opinions expressed in the letter and therefore maintain the standards of neutrality.103.250.145.90 (talk) 22:21, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
August 2020[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Steven Pinker, you may be blocked from editing. Crossroads -talk- 20:12, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Steven Pinker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Schazjmd (talk) 21:06, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
Thank you[edit]
I appreciate you engaging in the discussion on Talk:Steven Pinker. I know it can be a slow, frustrating process at times, especially with so many policies and guidelines to consider, but it's how we reach consensus on Wikipedia. Thanks for so clearly clarifying the changes that you think are needed in the article. Schazjmd (talk) 14:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020[edit]
Your recent editing history at Steven Pinker shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
When your addition of content is disputed, you need to discuss on the Talk page and gain consensus for adding it. Schazjmd (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Notice[edit]
You are the subject of a discussion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#McNulTEA. You are welcome to participate in that discussion. Crossroads -talk- 18:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
August 2020[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Guerillero | Parlez Moi 19:29, 28 August 2020 (UTC)