User talk:MechaCobre12

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
elcome to Wikipedia MechaCobre12, from WikiProject Editor Retention
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talk page of the article. Please take a minute to view a number of quick start pages for an overview of how to work within these guidelines and more information to help you better understand the practices and procedures editors are using. These include: The Newcomers Manual and User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia.

Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask me for assistance! Or, better yet, visit The Teahouse where veteran editors are waiting to assist you.

Policies, guidelines and peer assistance Help and Tutorials
The five pillars of Wikipedia.
The fundamental principles of the project.
Tutorial.
Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
Main policies of Wikipedia.
Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.
How to start a page.
If you want to create a new article
Style Guide.
The complete guide to how articles should look
.
Help.
The complete help guide
Copyright.
Addressing copyright concerns
.
Quick reference.
A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
Help Desk.
Here you can ask other editors for assistance
Your user pages and your sandbox.
Editing in your own "personal" space
Adoption program.
Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.
Frequently asked questions.
Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four tildes (~~~~) or by pressing or in the editing interface toolbox, located just above the editing window (when editing). You won't need to sign your contributions to articles themselves; you only need to when using talk pages. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance.

Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 21:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC) John from Idegon (talk) 21:17, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo
Hello! MechaCobre12, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! John from Idegon (talk) 21:18, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


December 2017[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm John from Idegon. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:John from Idegon that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. John from Idegon (talk) 17:30, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you remove reliably sourced content again, (particularly without trying to start a proper discussion; this is not an example), and replacing with poorly sourced content, you may lose your editing privilege. Thanks. Alex Shih (talk) 19:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John from Idegon (talk) First of all John from Ideon i asked are you are guys stupid because i gave you a source and you denied looking into it, i didn't say you were stupid i asked there's a difference. Alex Shih (talk) Alex Shih: first of all i contacted Wikipedia and they told me themselves i can edit if i wanted to even before i wanted and made any decisions to edit and i submitted a two websites with the links beforehand so they can edited it themselves and you can check the emails they also told me again i can do and plus i contacted volunteers so they could do it and once again they didn't do anything. Why don't ask before making any accusations? P.S i am new to Wikipedia editing why you guys think i wanted to give the Olympia entertainment and 313 presents links in the first place far as sources to someone here who is more experienced to edit...? P.S. the source you have from the reporter is false because that's attendance not the capacity because i been to the games and talked to workers there they told seating capacity is on the websites

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alex Shih (talk) 03:43, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
MechaCobre12, please understand that indefinite does not mean infinite. Your unsigned comment immediately above the block notice is incomprehensible. You were told multiple times that content disputes need to be discussed on the article's talk page yet you made no effort to do so. You were told multiple times that not all sources are reliable and we're referred to instructions on how to determine what sources were reliable. You were referred to an essay that explains that (and why) verifiability to reliable published sources is more important than "truth" here. An encyclopedia article is not a place for you to write what you know or have discovered. Instead an encyclopedia article is meant to be a summary of what already published reliable sources have said about a given subject. Frankly, your incomprehensible diatribe above and your failure to grasp that there's never a socially acceptable reason to refer to others as "stupid" leads me to believe you are very young. Although young people are welcome to edit here, it is expected that everyone conduct themselves with reasonably adult demeanor. That would include writing in full sentences with proper syntax, capitalization and punctuation; and conducting yourself in a reasonably professional manner (comparable to the behavior that would be expected in a school or workplace). My suggestion would be to spend some time reading the information linked in the welcome template at the top of this page, think on whether or not this is an activity you'll find appealing and if you decide it is, submit an unblock request showing you understand what you did wrong and what you will do in the future to avoid similar pitfalls. I wish you luck. John from Idegon (talk) 09:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

John from Idegon (talk) Alex Shih (talk) You guys are hypocrites you block me because you don't like what just any other news and information outlet and any political party whenever you challenge their nonsense. You still didn't listen anything i said continuously shows thats you people only think with emotion not logic nor commonsense. You say it's wrong to judge but yet judge me by assuming that i am young,which i am not. If you guys didn't feel as though you was stupid? You wouldn't let questions get to you especially when someone is trying to give points and submit information without trying to regulate. You guys act just as the hypocritical liberals. Its a shame we can't come to the heart of the matter of this situation and still didn't asked me where was my source?

Ok, I tried. Have a wonderful Christmas. Alex Shih, TPA? John from Idegon (talk) 16:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]