User talk:Megalibrarygirl/Archives/2020/August
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Meeting point
Do administrators willing to provide copies of deleted articles have a meeting point? 84.120.7.178 (talk) 16:45, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't. I just have people make requests of me here or by email. Do you need a copy? Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:48, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- I would like to make a project-wide proposal. Wikipedia:Viewing deleted content only adduces legal concerns. There is a Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. Do you think it would be fair to have, for instance, a Wikipedia:List of articles about non-notable topics? 84.120.7.178 (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- How do you think viewing deleted articles causes a legal issue? I'm not a lawyer, but my friend, Montanabw is. Maybe they can help with that end. I think, however, that creating a list of articles about non-notable topics would become huge! Also, some topics start out not being notable, and later become notable. So the list would constantly have to be maintained. Just looking at WP:AFD, you can see a huge list of topics that are being debated on in regards to notability. In a way, the archives of AFD are a list of non-notable topics. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:38, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- You may see Wikimedia Foundation's legal concerns at WP:VDC, but they do not relate to notability. On another hand, WP:HOAXLIST is list of articles, not a list of topics.
- Please do not focus on feasibility yet. Would it be good for Wikipedia users to have a list of articles about non-notable topics? 84.120.7.178 (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- I don't think it would make sense to have a list of non-notable topics based on several concerns. Such a list wouldn't be useful. It's hard enough to define notability in a general sense, and even more difficult to decide what's not notable. In addition, as I mentioned, topics that weren't notable at first, may become notable later on. Having a list of non-notable topics makes the creation of articles that later become notable a lot messier. Another issue is that, as humans, we define things by what they are, not by what they aren't. Because of that, a list of non-notable topics doesn't help the mission of Wikipedia because it can't help us locate and find notable topics. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 21:28, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- You are not answering my question; you keep talking about list of topics. Perhaps my question is confusing, so let me rephrase it: would it be good to have a Wikipedia:List of non-notable articles?
- It seems you may have trouble understanding the idea. Since pages can be deleted, could you create the mentioned page and let me develop the system? 84.120.7.178 (talk) 22:35, 1 August 2020 (UTC)
- What you're talking about would be a list, as far as I can tell. If you want to create this article, I think that you could probably use your sandbox to work it out there. I'm not interested in the project, but I appreciate you seeking out my input. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:08, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
- You are welcome. 84.120.7.178 (talk) 20:40, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
Hi Megalibrarygirl/Archives/2020/August,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.
September Women in Red edithons
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:51, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging