User talk:Members' Services Officer

I wonder, then, what you mean by "unconstructive". The epithet of "Mayor" was one which came to be associated with an office which has a long history. This history preceeds the use of this particular term, since the office with which it has come to be associated was described using a number of terms over some considerable period of time. For example, within Cambridge, this office pre-dated even 1207, since, prior to this date, the "Reeve" was appointed by the crown. The difference made by the charter of King John of 1207 was that it was granted to the local burgesses to appoint to this office. It is, therefore, misleading to suggest that Cambridge possessed a Mayor only from 1213.

2007 marked the eight hundredth anniversary of the aforementioned charter. My colleagues and I spent over a year and a half planning a whole series of events throughout the year in order to commemorate and to celebrate the event. These efforts earned us the title of "Civic Office of the Year", on the fifteenth of March 2007.

For the sake of anonymity, I did not wish to use my personal name, and, for the purposes of a pen name, my job title seemed a good choice.

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Cambridge has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy^gabs_adds 15:13, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Your username

From your first edit, I understand your intent here. However, I suggest you might want to change your name or open a new account under a name that meets the username policy, as your current choice of name could imply a position of authority to newer users. Daniel Case (talk) 15:21, 14 January 2009 (UTC)