User talk:Mfarabola

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AfC notification: Draft:Tullio Farabola has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tullio Farabola. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Tullio Farabola has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tullio Farabola. Thanks! -- RoySmith (talk) 18:57, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tullio Farabola (March 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 19:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Mfarabola! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 19:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tullio Farabola[edit]

Hello, Mfarabola. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tullio Farabola".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 06:50, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Mfarabola requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:11, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Writing about yourself[edit]

You are welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, but it is not a social media site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to write about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, so it is selective about subjects for articles. Writing about oneself is strongly discouraged, for reasons explained at Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography.

Wikipedia user pages are not like those at social networking sites. Their use is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST:

"Wikipedians have individual user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to work on the encyclopedia. Limited autobiographical information is allowed, but user pages do not serve as personal webpages, blogs, or repositories for large amounts of material irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you want to post your résumé or make a personal webpage, please use one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account. The focus of user pages should not be social networking or amusement, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration. Humorous pages that refer to Wikipedia in some way may be created in an appropriate namespace. Personal web pages are often speedily deleted."

You can find out more about Wikipedia at the WP:Welcome page and the WP:Introduction, as well as Wikipedia's plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:13, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Drm310, you are right to criticize attempts to use Wikipedia as a social network. However, I have examined the "deleted" user page that you had deleted. If Mfarabola was indeed writing about himself, then he was writing about a photographer who died almost exactly 37 years ago. This would be a most remarkable case of contribution from beyond the grave, one that would amply deserve a write-up in the Signpost. -- Hoary (talk) 00:50, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Hoary: Well, I didn't delete the page (only nom'd it) as I'm not an admin and have no such privileges. As for the message, I probably saw the similarity between the subject and the username, and just went on autopilot. {{uw-coi}} was probably the more appropriate choice of template here. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 06:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Drm310, yes, it's now obvious to me that my wording, "you had deleted", is ambiguous. (I'd meant "whose deletion you'd proposed".) Sorry about that. And of course this wasn't a suitable use of a user page. -- Hoary (talk) 06:24, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tullio Farabola (December 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 00:35, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

It's clear that you are not Tullio Farabola, but you say that he was your father. You therefore have a conflict of interest when writing about him. Please read and digest the page "Conflict of interest". If this is dismayingly long, please read and digest the page "Plain and simple conflict of interest guide". Perhaps you prefer to read Italian: it is likely (although not certain) that the gist of the page "Contenuti promozionali o celebrativi" is very similar to that of "Conflict of interest". -- Hoary (talk) 06:45, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tullio Farabola has been accepted[edit]

Tullio Farabola, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:09, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fedele Toscani (January 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 11:03, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Fedele Toscani[edit]

Information icon Hello, Mfarabola. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fedele Toscani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]