User talk:Mgavaldon

This is Mgavaldon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mar-Co Equipment Industrial Municipal Sweepers and Scrubbers (September 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mar-Co Equipment Industrial Municipal Sweepers and Scrubbers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mar-Co Equipment Industrial Municipal Sweepers and Scrubbers, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 10:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mgavaldon! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 10:17, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Mar-Co Equipment Industrial Municipal Sweepers and Scrubbers[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Mar-Co Equipment Industrial Municipal Sweepers and Scrubbers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dan arndt (talk) 10:18, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Helen Slater, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Removing Infobox is not an improvement. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 02:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am trying to update Helen's bio for her, I do not understand why you keep removing the content Mgavaldon (talk) 03:10, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I already explained back at the article talk page that you were clearly messing up the info box. – FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:13, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not understanding your point. I want to update the first few paragraphs of the page with her updated bio. The infobox was not messed up this last time. Where else am I allowed to edit and add her bio?

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Helen Slater. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. You're making the lead way too long. FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 03:32, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The 'lead' is not any longer than the one on Kate Winslet's page. ?? and I have read the editing tutorial, I'm using the Visual Editor.

According to Google regarding lead limit; The lead section (also known as the lead or introduction) of a Wikipedia article is the section before the table of contents and the first heading. ... Article length Fewer than 15,000 characters 15,000–30,000 characters

the bio I'm trying to add is; CHARACTERS 2385, WORDS 361, SENTENCES 26, PARAGRAPHS 8, SPACES 360

Mgavaldon moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Mgavaldon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 04:36, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Kinu ^t/_c 05:27, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock Me So I Can Submit My Edits Correctly[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mgavaldon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my account so I can work in Sandbox to make the correct edits to the bio. I will not attempt to add or remove anything til I get it right. Mgavaldon (talk) 18:28, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're going to need to review conflict of interest and paid editing, and tell how your future edits will be different. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:06, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.