User talk:Midiman Alex
February 2008[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Society for Creative Anachronism, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- If you wish to contribute to (or criticize) an article, post the kind of things you have been posting to its talk page, not directly to the article itself. Your current manner of posting is a form of vandalism, even if well intended. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:29, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Please use the talk page, not the article itself, to make comments and criticisms about the article and its contents. This avoids revert wars (WP:Edit war) such as the one developing on the Society for Creative Anachronism article. Thank you! Wilhelm meis (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
May 2009[edit]
For the second time, please use the talk page, not the article itself, to make comments and criticisms about the article and its contents. This is much better than making uncostructive edits that are quickly reverted, such as those you made to Society for Creative Anachronism. And if you don't like the content of the article, stop complaining and start improving. Beastiepaws (talk) 19:29, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
The 'Facts versus opinions about The Society for Creative Anachronism ' section was moved to bottom to be in chronological order. It's still there (just moved) so you don't have to add it back. Please avoid using level 1 headings (headings surrounded by single '='), convention is to start with level 2 headings ("surrounded by '=='). Thank you. RJFJR (talk) 20:55, 5 May 2009 (UTC)