User talk:Mitchburndt

Speedy deletion of Dead presidents day[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Dead presidents day, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. —BradV 17:07, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Moneyday[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Moneyday, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Accounting4Taste:talk 17:16, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block of IP 64.251.151.232[edit]

Hi. The last account I blocked was User:64.251.151.232. Is this the one you were talking about? If so, the block was due to edits mentioned on that user's talk page, the last of which was this one, which may not have been yours if that IP is for a public computer. I apologize if you sometimes use that IP, and have been inconvenienced, but as Orange Mike and Tnxman307 stated, you can still use your username account. Let me know if there's anything else I can do to help you. Nightscream (talk) 19:06, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had nothing to do with this edit. I also find the instructions for how to do the unblocking unnecessarily confusing and frustrating, if anyone wants that feedback. I'm not sure I'm putting this info in the right place. I just want to link a Bee Gee's song on the discography to its wikipedia page, and now I can't. Please unblock me. Thanks. Mitchburndt (talk) 13:59, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock me please[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mitchburndt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have nothing to do with the edit being mentioned on my talk page. I rarely edit at all, usually just to link a song to its page, which is helpful. Please stop blocking me. I'm also unsure that I'm doing the right thing to get unblocked, and think the instructions could be clearer. Thanks!Mitchburndt (talk) 14:01, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: You're note blocked. Your underlying IP or range may be subject to a block, however the fact that you are editing articles shows that you can edit while logged in to your account. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 17:16, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.