User talk:Moskerhus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2021[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to List of Kurdish historical sites, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Bisotun, Taq Bostan, Ganjali Khan Complex (amongst others), are not "Kurdish historical sites", nor do the sources you added verify it. - LouisAragon (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moskerhus. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 04:08, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

eh, Hi, i looked at the supposed “evidences”, and i just want to say that i have nothing to do with the other user that i am somehow suspected of using as a sockpuppet. either way, about me reinstating user:Khorlers' edits, i never did such thing, i merely reinstated my own edits.

For example, see here: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1003439000 i added a source from a notable called Touraj daryaee, then later that user called Khorler come up and added some 12k materials of sources: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1003824309 and what followed was a bunch of reversions, then the user who accused me (LouisAragon) of sockpuppetry deleted all of Khorler's material including even mine and mistook me for adding all the 12k materials (when in fact, it was the editions of Khorler): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1007069765 and then i only reinstated my own edit, not any of the other edits by Khorler : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1007271061 so i have no idea how LouisAragon got the idea that i reinstated another user's edit, i merely reinstated my own edits only.

Thanks anyways.

Moskerhus, I've gone ahead and removed your block as part of reviewing the block against Khorler, with the blocking admin's consent, as I think that the evidence of sockpuppetry is inconclusive. signed, Rosguill talk 15:43, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok, thanks! Moskerhus (talk) 16:13, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]