User talk:MrSandman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! --Ragib 28 June 2005 21:38 (UTC)

Thanks for your contribution at Polysomnography! But we have to cleanup two issues concerning the image:

  • You overwrote the image needed for R.E.M. (band) (short image names are problematic due to this problem)
  • You didn't state license and source of the image.

If you just affirm that you've done the image and release it into the public domain, I can do the cleanup. Even better would be a PNG version of the image, as in the JPG version, image compression artefacts are visible.

Pjacobi 22:13, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]



I uploaded a .png image. The image is not great quality to begin with....it was a Windows screenshot originally. I'll change my other references to this image. This, like all of the images I upload regarding sleep, are my own images. Sorry I didn't specify.

MrSandman 22:24, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Thanks! I've restored the R.E.M. image. --Pjacobi 22:36, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Coffee and Sleep[edit]

Hi MrSandman, I just had my last university exam of this year and so I'll have much more time to search for the rather unusual uses of coffee. I'll ask questions in sleep disorder forums so I can abandon both "my girlfriend works in an old age's pension where coffee is used" and the German website strategy. Mh, in the German Wikipedia weblinks to English pages are quite common... --Keimzelle 19:34, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The metabolic significance of sleep[edit]

I appreciate your invitation to extend a link covering the discoveries regarding sleep & obesity and the effects of sleep deprivation on insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction. I don't know when I'll get the time to begin on this but I would like to accept the challenge to do it when I can because I feel so strongly that the key to a better understanding what sleep & wakefulness are, 'balancing' states, has much to do with understanding the 'balancing' states of metabolism - anabolism & catabolism. I certainly have the long-term interest in pursuing the understanding of what sleep and wakefulness are. I do think that the answer to 'Why do we sleep' will only be found if we simultaneously ask the question 'Why do we wake up'. Since the topic isn't something that I can deal with in the course of my 'day job' the only practical way for me to pursue it is to adopt this viewpoint as my working hypothesis and starting point. All I can really hope to do is to find a way to fit together on a framework some of the pieces of such a puzzle that real scientists have been able to build. --GeneMosher 23:28, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

72 degs[edit]

Interesting. Can you give me the references to the 72degs vs REM, etc? I found that I'm very sensitive to cooling by radiation, i.e., I sense when the enclosure's walls are below 72 deg C. By sense I mean shivering and perhaps EDS. About the tryptophan, narcoleptics might be more sensitive: anechdotal stories in private forums indicate that narcoleptics have learned to avoid turkey because makes them sleepy. My comment about the air conditioner was to signal to Keimzelle that thre are more ways to change the temp of a room than those that the one he affirmed categorically and which is OK only for him in Central Europe, not in the Arctic or in the desert. Jclerman 03:30, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anthropology of sleep[edit]

thanks for your kind comment. I was fascinated by a radio documentary on the subject and decided to add some mention. Keep up the good work Peregrine981 05:22, 22 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What program's in those screenshots?[edit]

What program's that in your screenshots, like this one and this one? --Ihope127 23:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Alice 4: http://www.mayohealthcare.com.au/products/homecare_sleepDiagnos_alice4_profile.htm

MrSandman 01:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your "File:Sleep EEG Stage 4.jpg"[edit]

Stage 3 or stage 4?

is described on the Commons page as stage 3 in one section and as stage 4 in another.

The 'Summary' section says: "This is a screen shot of a patient during Slow Wave Sleep (stage N3)."

The 'File History' section says: "This a screen shot of a polysomnogram of a patient in Slow Wave Sleep (stage 4)."

Which is it, please? Thanks, --Hordaland (talk) 07:13, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


It is stage 4. When I posted the image, SWS generally referred to stage 4 sleep.

Thank you! --Hordaland (talk) 08:03, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How to sleep less[edit]

MrSandman, Can we make a faster transition from stage 1&2 to stage 3&4 in order to sleep less? Or do you have any recommendation about how to sleep less? Thank you

How to sleep less[edit]

MrSandman, Can we make a faster transition from stage 1&2 to stage 3&4 in order to sleep less? Or do you have any recommendation about how to sleep less? Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by Efebay (talkcontribs) 05:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Sleep EEG Stage 4.jpg[edit]

File:Sleep EEG Stage 4.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Sleep EEG Stage 4.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Sleep EEG Stage 4.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 20:05, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Apnea2Min.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Apnea2Min.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MBisanz talk 00:38, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]