User talk:Mrdaveshaw

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speedy deletion of Zooillogical[edit]

A tag has been placed on Zooillogical requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TallNapoleon (talk) 03:59, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Zooillogical[edit]

Hi there. I have deleted this page under our speedy deletion criteria as it didn't indicate the importance of the subject through the use of reliable sources. While I know that webcomics are a bit subjective in evaluating notability, a check around suggested that there were no reliable sources that had discussed this one in any substantial manner - it got less than 1000 Google hits, for example, which is a fairly low number. If you feel that the deletion was incorrect, I'd be happy to take a look at any references that you can provide me to prove that it is, in fact, notable enough to pass our guidelines, or take those to deletion review. Also, from your username I assume you're one of the creators of the comic; you should be aware of our conflict of interest guidelines, as well. Tony Fox (arf!) 05:49, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]