User talk:Mrpemdasrescue4

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Love You to Death (Type O Negative song), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Love You to Death (Type O Negative song) was changed by Mrpemdasrescue4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.968333 on 2011-01-10T23:43:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dead to Rights V: Grant City Birthday Party[edit]

The article Dead to Rights V: Grant City Birthday Party has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources can be found to verify the existence of this title. Possible hoax.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:00, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pete (album)[edit]

The article Pete (album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources can be found to verify the existence of this album. Possible hoax.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:05, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wes Borland, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wes Borland was changed by Mrpemdasrescue4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95067 on 2011-01-17T23:29:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chocolate Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water II[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Chocolate Starfish and the Hot Dog Flavored Water II, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:29, 19 January 2011 (UTC) Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, I DONT KNOWWWWWWWW, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Trythisonyourpiano (talk) 06:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of WMD (album) for deletion[edit]

The article WMD (album) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WMD (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:23, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kerry King[edit]

Kerry King is definitely not married to Max Payne. Please don't vandalize. --BladeBronson (talk) 08:57, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Load III for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Load III is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Load III until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:52, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

El Tony Syn listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect El Tony Syn. Since you had some involvement with the El Tony Syn redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sceptre ^(talk) 18:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tom Araya, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rumors[edit]

Reviewing your history of contributions, I find that you appear to be using Wikipedia solely to spread rumors and blatant misinformation. Please stop this. Information on Wikipedia must be verifiable and neutral. Adding your own opinions about musicians is inappropriate. Adding vague rumors about future albums is inappropriate. Please stick to verifiable facts. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:18, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Democratic Union (Guatemala), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Democratic Union (Guatemala) was changed by Mrpemdasrescue4 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950969 on 2011-03-01T21:11:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:11, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to 1996 India Open constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to George Stapleton. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Heinrich Holk. —Tom Morris (talk) 21:13, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 21:19, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]