User talk:Mvarney85

April 2012[edit]

Your recent editing history at Dog food shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Drmies (talk) 03:09, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 03:16, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Mvarney85 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have revamped the site and it contains links to references and videos that support the topic including an interview with the president of the AFCO. I was just trying to share the info with pet owners so they would be aware of whats in most pet food. I have removed the recommended page so it is no longer promoting clickbank ads I am sorry about that. The only link left to a sales page was left because some of the information I got from Dr. Jane Bicks and I believe she has earned the right to be a trusted source. Mvarney85 (talk) 04:47, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per comment below. — Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You're not going to be unblocked to add more links to your website to articles. What other topics do you intend to work on? Nick-D (talk) 05:03, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]