User talk:Mw011235

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mw011235, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:53, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello![edit]

Have a good day. Lukasmar (talk) 20:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Martyna! I'm Michael. Mw011235 (talk) 23:43, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michelle and Martyna. I'm NoeerNoeer Alotaibi (talk) 23:53, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New Section Test[edit]

This is a test of adding a new section to a talk page. Mw011235 (talk) 01:17, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hi Micheal , I'm Noeer--Noeer Alotaibi (talk) 03:13, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noeer! Mw011235 (talk) 04:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ordinal data article[edit]

I am starting to add changes to the article in the sandbox. For the analysis and methodology section, for the sake of this assignment, I will only be providing an overview of the methods and 'big picture' ideas rather than going in deep into equations and theory. Let me know otherwise. I'll continue adding and editing our draft. Lond6846 (talk) 17:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me, Michelle. Have at it! Mw011235 (talk) 18:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hey Michael, can you check out my talk page? Someone left a message there for me that might be beneficial to read. It is being fixed and the citation was removed, but is a nice piece of information! Lond6846 (talk) 01:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Good to know about the circular referencing issue. Sounds like we should redo the existing article entirely using our own paraphrasing from good sources to help us avoid this. Thanks Michelle. Mw011235 (talk) 14:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]